H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Todd Woodbridge vs Jeremy Bates H2H: 0-1

Jeremy Bates holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeremy Bates leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeremy Bates won the 1988 Roland Garros round of 128 6-4 2-6 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Woodbridge
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jeremy Bates
GBR Age 64 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Bates #72 6-4 2-6 6-2 7-6 Todd Woodbridge #263 Match data May 25, 1988* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,870 239 231 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jeremy Bates #1,314 #54 700 1,717 117 175 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Woodbridge Jeremy Bates
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% #372 1,482 0 0
19 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,494 0 0
20 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,703 0 0 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,470 0 0
21 1992 25–23 52.1% #54 1,675 0 0 1983 1–4 20.0% #329 1,466 0 0
22 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,665 0 0 1984 0–6 0.0% #185 1,397 0 0
23 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,662 0 0 1985 9–11 45.0% #99 1,479 0 0
24 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,811 0 1 1986 9–16 36.0% #187 1,513 0 0
25 1996 34–24 58.6% #36 1,754 0 1 1987 12–10 54.5% #89 1,644 0 0
26 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,801 0 2 1988 15–19 44.1% #152 1,622 0 0
27 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,716 0 2 1989 13–12 52.0% #96 1,659 0 0
28 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,602 0 2 1990 6–18 25.0% #126 1,529 0 0
29 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2 1991 4–5 44.4% #168 1,571 0 0
30 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,597 0 2 1992 7–12 36.8% #105 1,582 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1993 12–17 41.4% #98 1,595 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1994 16–16 50.0% #77 1,618 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1995 12–22 35.3% #143 1,522 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1996 0–3 0.0% #600 1,485 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Woodbridge Jeremy Bates
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1990 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1993 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
23 1994 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1996 20 13 33 60.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1997 22 12 34 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1988 8 12 20 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1989 9 9 18 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 1999 6 10 16 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1990 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2001 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1992 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 11 17 35.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 146 131 277 52.7% 21 32 53 39.6% 43 31 74 58.1% 29 37 66 43.9% — 58 80 138 42.0% 8 21 29 27.6% 34 44 78 43.6% 17 30 47 36.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/418 of Todd Woodbridge's and 106/126 of Jeremy Bates's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Todd Woodbridge Jeremy Bates
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 37/48 2.0 3.4 59.8% 67.3% 50.1% 57.0% 43.8% 60.2% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 44/48 2.7 4.8 60.3% 69.2% 48.5% 59.9% 40.7% 60.9% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 33/39 2.4 4.5 60.5% 67.2% 47.6% 51.3% 41.8% 59.2% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 30/34 3.4 4.9 59.1% 70.6% 45.0% 55.4% 47.1% 60.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 50/54 2.7 4.6 57.9% 70.2% 48.3% 60.0% 42.9% 61.3% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 51/58 3.3 5.3 56.7% 69.0% 48.1% 55.8% 42.8% 60.0% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1997 42/51 3.6 4.0 58.4% 70.3% 46.0% 60.1% 45.6% 60.2% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 36/42 3.3 4.4 59.1% 64.4% 45.6% 54.0% 46.9% 56.8% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 17/24 3.7 4.1 62.5% 66.7% 47.9% 51.7% 49.4% 60.0% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 10/10 2.3 4.2 60.2% 66.6% 49.1% 57.1% 52.0% 59.7% 39.4% 1991 7/9 3.1 3.3 61.5% 69.8% 53.1% 62.7% 33.5% 63.1% 35.3%
30 2001 10/10 4.2 5.5 59.8% 66.1% 46.9% 59.1% 33.6% 58.5% 39.4% 1992 17/19 3.9 3.8 60.0% 69.8% 42.1% 60.1% 47.3% 58.6% 35.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 24/29 2.0 2.9 53.4% 64.7% 48.5% 50.3% 44.1% 57.3% 37.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 26/32 4.0 4.7 52.9% 73.0% 48.2% 63.0% 46.0% 61.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 30/34 3.8 4.2 53.1% 68.6% 44.8% 45.6% 39.7% 57.2% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 2/3 4.5 5.5 57.5% 66.0% 46.0% 61.1% 14.3% 57.6% 32.1%
Career — 360/470 3.0 4.5 59.1% 68.4% 47.6% 56.8% 44.0% 59.9% 39.3% — 106/292 3.4 3.9 54.9% 69.0% 46.6% 54.7% 42.6% 58.9% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Woodbridge Jeremy Bates
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1453 103.4 — — — — +59 — — 21.1% -1.53 — 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1573 126.2 — — — — +14 — — 44.1% -0.68 2–0 5–2 (71%) — -0.39 1980 1482 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.25
19 1990 1705 141.6 — — — — +26 -177 — 47.3% -0.16 8–7 (53%) 8–5 (62%) 106.3 -0.46 1981 1495 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.12
20 1991 1704 135.7 -0.60 +1.97 0.996 49.9% -11 -147 -95 48.4% -0.03 5–3 (63%) 9–8 (53%) 102.3 -0.95 1982 1470 96.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 1992 1676 141.7 -0.77 +2.88 1.047 51.0% +48 -130 -62 49.2% +0.12 9–8 (53%) 11–13 (46%) 101.7 -0.18 1983 1467 110.8 — — — — — — — 18.2% -1.91 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.21
22 1993 1665 133.1 -2.39 +1.69 0.971 49.6% +31 -91 -53 46.4% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 99.9 -0.10 1984 1398 90.5 — — — — — — +36 13.3% -2.33 0–2 1–1 — +0.70
23 1994 1662 123.5 -1.35 -0.55 0.931 48.8% +6 -162 +27 46.2% -0.19 9–8 (53%) 8–10 (44%) 100.1 +1.36 1985 1480 114.0 — — — — +93 — -61 46.8% -0.26 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.1 +1.57
24 1995 1811 136.8 +0.19 +0.89 0.983 49.6% -41 -183 -91 54.0% +0.06 6–6 (50%) 13–7 (65%) 104.8 -2.85 1986 1514 122.4 — — — — +60 -52 -37 44.6% -0.57 2–8 (20%) 6–4 (60%) 99.4 +0.61
25 1996 1754 142.3 -1.66 +2.21 0.980 49.9% +8 -93 +11 56.4% +0.32 7–4 (64%) 16–12 (57%) 105.8 +0.28 1987 1645 121.6 — — — — -16 — -76 51.7% +0.21 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 105.1 +0.46
26 1997 1801 143.6 -0.92 +3.35 1.040 50.8% -19 -148 +69 58.1% +0.40 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) 102.4 -0.11 1988 1623 121.3 — — — — -11 -108 -55 41.7% -0.74 10–5 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 105.6 +0.50
27 1998 1717 136.8 -3.37 +1.99 0.923 48.5% +12 -51 +123 46.8% -0.22 12–2 (86%) 6–12 (33%) 100.6 -0.66 1989 1659 123.3 — — — — -14 -100 -69 52.3% -0.03 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 103.3 +1.18
28 1999 1603 123.7 -0.75 -0.98 0.870 47.8% +69 -37 +208 35.5% -0.95 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 +0.58 1990 1529 118.0 — — — — +33 — +70 33.9% -0.97 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) 95.2 -0.28
29 2000 1589 116.3 -2.34 +1.34 0.976 49.6% +38 — — 48.3% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.9 -0.13 1991 1572 117.8 +0.31 +0.02 0.958 49.0% -15 — +54 45.8% -0.50 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.30
30 2001 1598 112.4 -2.79 +0.59 0.950 48.9% -17 — +231 43.3% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.55 1992 1582 113.5 -1.79 -1.18 0.850 47.0% -68 — +93 43.8% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.1 +0.12
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1595 125.5 -2.87 +0.17 0.884 47.4% -23 — +86 38.8% -0.60 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 102.6 +0.79
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1618 127.5 -0.88 -2.29 0.893 48.2% -29 — +141 52.4% -0.13 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) 101.2 +1.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1523 122.8 -4.22 -1.39 0.847 46.5% +33 — +186 33.3% -1.05 5–2 (71%) 7–8 (47%) 105.0 +1.42
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1485 94.4 -1.81 -0.66 0.757 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.04
Career — 1870 141.5 -1.32 +1.70 0.980 49.7% +10 -122 +24 49.1% -0.07 79–58 (58%) 102–93 (52%) 106.9 -0.57 — 1718 125.6 -2.36 -1.12 0.872 47.3% +3 -78 +30 42.1% -0.60 42–45 (48%) 53–55 (49%) 104.9 +2.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.