H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 1-1
Todd Woodbridge and Luiz Mattar are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Luiz Mattar leads 1–0 on clay, while Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1994 Atlanta third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1994* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Luiz Mattar | 6-2 6-1 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Jul 28, 1993* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 7-6(6) (ret.) | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Woodbridge | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |