H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 3-1
Todd Woodbridge holds a 3–1 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Todd Woodbridge leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 1999 Miami Masters first round 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1999* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Martin Damm Sr | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Jan 8, 1998* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1997 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 6-7(6) 7-5 7-5 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1996* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 6-4 6-3 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,744 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Todd Woodbridge | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |