H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 1-1
Todd Woodbridge and Nicklas Kulti are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1996 Roland Garros first round 0-6 6-2 2-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Todd Woodbridge | 0-6 6-2 2-6 6-4 6-1 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1994* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicklas Kulti | 6-2 6-3 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Woodbridge | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |