H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs Richard Matuszewski H2H: 1-1
Todd Woodbridge and Richard Matuszewski are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1990 Tokyo Outdoor second round 6-4 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1990* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Richard Matuszewski | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1988* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Richard Matuszewski | 6-4 6-2 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Richard Matuszewski | #839 | #49 | 405 | 1,695 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Woodbridge | Richard Matuszewski | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #362 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #90 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #56 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #119 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #219 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #143 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #307 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |