H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-1
Todd Woodbridge and Sargis Sargsian are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 1999 Delray Beach third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 1999* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Sargis Sargsian | 6-1 6-1 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Oct 15, 1998* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Todd Woodbridge | 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-4 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Woodbridge | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |