H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs Thomas Hogstedt H2H: 3-0
Todd Woodbridge holds a 3–0 lead over Thomas Hogstedt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Todd Woodbridge leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1992 Stockholm Masters second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1992* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Todd Woodbridge | 7-5 6-2 | Thomas Hogstedt | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1991* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Todd Woodbridge | 6-3 6-0 | Thomas Hogstedt | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1990* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 6-1 6-0 | Thomas Hogstedt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Thomas Hogstedt | #1,032 | #38 | 413 | 1,736 | 90 | 153 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Woodbridge | Thomas Hogstedt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #549 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #82 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #84 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #210 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #179 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #133 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 12–26 | 31.6% | #91 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #130 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #181 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #309 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |