H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 3-0
Todd Woodbridge holds a 3–0 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Todd Woodbridge leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1996 Nottingham quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1996* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Todd Woodbridge | 6-4 6-4 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Mar 1, 1996* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Todd Woodbridge | 7-6(4) 6-7(1) 6-4 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Oct 19, 1995* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Todd Woodbridge | 7-6(3) 7-6(1) | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Todd Woodbridge | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |