H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 0-1
Wayne Arthurs holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wayne Arthurs leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Arthurs won the 2001 Hong Kong third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2001* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Wayne Arthurs | 6-2 6-2 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Woodbridge | Wayne Arthurs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |