H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tom Cain vs Garth Haynes H2H: 1-0

Tom Cain holds a 1–0 lead over Garth Haynes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tom Cain leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tom Cain won the 1982 Columbus round of 32 6-2 6-4.

USA Age 67 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
USA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tom Cain 6-2 6-4 Garth Haynes Match data Aug 6, 1982* R32 Columbus ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tom Cain #693 #70 0 1,650 43 67 39.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Garth Haynes #627 #369 0 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Tom Cain Garth Haynes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 4–9 30.8% #219 1,512 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,487 0 0
1981 2–5 28.6% 1,476 0 0
1982 13–14 48.1% 1,551 0 0
1983 15–19 44.1% #95 1,614 0 0
1984 6–9 40.0% #182 1,603 0 0
1985 3–10 23.1% #213 1,552 0 0
1986 0–1 0.0% #597 1,537 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Tom Cain Garth Haynes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
1981 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
1983 6 7 13 46.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
1984 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1985 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
1986 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 18 24 42 42.9% 12 17 29 41.4% 5 9 14 35.7% 8 17 25 32.0% Career 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Tom Cain Garth Haynes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1512 120.9 +61 -15 32.3% -1.03 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) +0.32 1982 1487 97.0 0.0% -3.00 +0.12
1981 1477 98.9 +51 +20 40.0% -1.07 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +1.35
1982 1552 124.8 +21 +2 -40 46.8% -0.03 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) +1.94
1983 1615 130.4 +13 -24 -86 47.0% -0.12 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) +0.53
1984 1604 115.1 -3 -44 44.1% -0.15 2–1 (67%) 2–5 (29%) +0.40
1985 1552 117.6 +5 31.3% -1.09 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) -0.01
1986 1538 97.8 0.0% -4.00 +0.05
Career 1650 126.9 +20 -8 -54 42.1% -0.42 18–17 (51%) 14–21 (40%) 97.9 +4.20 Career 1500 98.4 0.0% -3.00 +12.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.