H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tom Cain vs Jonathan Smith H2H: 1-0

Tom Cain holds a 1–0 lead over Jonathan Smith in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tom Cain leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tom Cain won the 1982 Queen's Club Championships round of 64 3-6 6-4 10-8.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tom Cain
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jonathan Smith
GBR Age 71

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tom Cain 3-6 6-4 10-8 Jonathan Smith Match data Jun 9, 1982* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tom Cain #693 #70 0 1,650 43 67 39.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jonathan Smith — — — 1,586 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tom Cain Jonathan Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1980 4–9 30.8% #219 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1982 13–14 48.1% — 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1983 15–19 44.1% #95 1,614 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1984 6–9 40.0% #182 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1985 3–10 23.1% #213 1,552 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1986 0–1 0.0% #597 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tom Cain Jonathan Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1980 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1978 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 1983 6 7 13 46.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 0 1 100.0%
26 1985 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 18 24 42 42.9% 12 17 29 41.4% 5 9 14 35.7% 8 17 25 32.0% — 6 14 20 30.0% 8 19 27 29.6% 16 31 47 34.0% 3 2 5 60.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tom Cain Jonathan Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1512 105.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — -0.11
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1487 103.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — — — -0.18
21 1980 1512 120.9 — — — — +61 -15 — 32.3% -1.03 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.32 1976 1465 107.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.75 — 0–1 — +0.31
22 1981 1477 98.9 — — — — +51 +20 — 40.0% -1.07 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +1.35 1977 1506 105.3 — — — — — — -2 43.5% -0.65 1–2 (33%) — — +0.39
23 1982 1552 124.8 — — — — +21 +2 -40 46.8% -0.03 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.94 1978 1514 113.4 — — — — — +15 -5 29.2% -1.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.09
24 1983 1615 130.4 — — — — +13 -24 -86 47.0% -0.12 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.53 1979 1503 98.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.38
25 1984 1604 115.1 — — — — -3 — -44 44.1% -0.15 2–1 (67%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.40 1980 1535 108.9 — — — — — — -23 45.0% -0.20 1–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.54
26 1985 1552 117.6 — — — — +5 — — 31.3% -1.09 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.01 1981 1555 122.0 — — — — +31 — -31 40.8% -0.71 3–5 (38%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.49
27 1986 1538 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.05 1982 1551 112.8 — — — — +40 -55 -39 39.3% -0.80 4–3 (57%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.55
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1516 109.7 — — — — — — -6 21.1% -1.79 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.07
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1525 110.9 — — — — — -13 -19 43.5% -0.26 2–2 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.91
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1500 95.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.34 0–2 2–0 — +0.21
Career — 1650 126.9 — — — — +20 -8 -54 42.1% -0.42 18–17 (51%) 14–21 (40%) 97.9 +4.20 — 1586 117.5 — — — — +35 -19 -22 37.4% -0.89 15–19 (44%) 20–17 (54%) 103.7 +3.36

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.