H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Tom Edlefsen vs Jan Leschly H2H: 0-1

Jan Leschly holds a 1–0 lead over Tom Edlefsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Leschly leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Leschly won the 1968 Macon round of 32 6-4 3-6 8-6.

USA Age 84 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
DEN Age 86 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan Leschly 6-4 3-6 8-6 Tom Edlefsen Match data Feb 22, 1968* R32 Macon ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tom Edlefsen — #94 0 1,740 109 144 43.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jan Leschly — — — 1,785 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tom Edlefsen Jan Leschly
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
26 1968 19–22 46.3% — 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1969 26–25 51.0% — 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1970 16–18 47.1% — 1,594 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1971 21–19 52.5% — 1,630 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1972 10–10 50.0% — 1,719 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1973 9–25 26.5% #111 1,570 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1974 6–16 27.3% #118 1,508 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1975 2–9 18.2% #172 1,511 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tom Edlefsen Jan Leschly
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
26 1968 6 8 14 42.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1969 7 7 14 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1968 12 4 16 75.0% 2 0 2 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 1970 7 9 16 43.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1969 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 1971 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1970 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1972 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1971 4 7 11 36.4% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 1973 5 9 14 35.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 8 9 11.1% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1974 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 56 101 44.6% 30 36 66 45.5% 16 18 34 47.1% 18 34 52 34.6% — 17 13 30 56.7% 9 9 18 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tom Edlefsen Jan Leschly
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
26 1968 1529 107.7 — — — — -11 -39 +57 47.6% -0.09 5–8 (38%) — — +1.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1969 1597 119.2 — — — — +6 -63 +29 50.0% +0.15 8–9 (47%) — — +1.81 1968 1671 117.8 — — — — +128 — — 64.4% +0.81 5–2 (71%) — — +1.32
28 1970 1595 114.7 — — — — +15 -21 — 48.1% +0.22 4–5 (44%) 0–2 — +3.58 1969 1681 105.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.14
29 1971 1630 119.3 — — — — -4 0 — 51.6% +0.18 9–8 (53%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 +3.35 1970 1657 109.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.90
30 1972 1720 125.4 — — — — -27 — — 45.1% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 6–4 (60%) 108.7 -1.17 1971 1780 136.0 — — — — -52 -30 -165 46.5% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 104.9 -1.38
31 1973 1571 118.2 — — — — -6 +60 — 30.4% -1.11 6–7 (46%) 3–7 (30%) 98.7 -1.00 1972 1782 109.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +1.00 0–1 — — -0.15
32 1974 1509 109.4 — — — — +36 +67 — 32.7% -1.49 2–3 (40%) 5–3 (63%) 101.9 +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1975 1512 118.2 — — — — +16 — — 24.0% -1.88 1–2 (33%) — — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1740 120.0 — — — — +1 -14 +41 44.2% -0.32 43–45 (49%) 21–22 (49%) 103.1 +3.14 — 1786 129.0 — — — — +68 -30 -165 52.1% +0.14 11–7 (61%) 5–5 (50%) 106.3 -1.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.