H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tom Nijssen vs Jan Gunnarsson H2H: 1-1
Tom Nijssen and Jan Gunnarsson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tom Nijssen won the 1988 Hamburg third round 6-3 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1988* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tom Nijssen | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Jan Gunnarsson | Match data |
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jan Gunnarsson | 6-1 6-3 6-3 | Tom Nijssen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Nijssen | #827 | #87 | 242 | 1,678 | 39 | 76 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan Gunnarsson | #774 | #25 | 579 | 1,822 | 190 | 203 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tom Nijssen | Jan Gunnarsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #389 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #274 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #99 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #39 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #253 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #221 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #235 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #94 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #793 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #296 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #511 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |