H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tom Nijssen vs Jonathan Canter H2H: 1-1

Tom Nijssen and Jonathan Canter are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tom Nijssen leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1990 Hong Kong Open quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tom Nijssen
NED Age 61 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jonathan Canter
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jonathan Canter #229 6-1 6-4 Tom Nijssen #145 Match data Apr 28, 1990* QF Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Tom Nijssen #102 6-2 6-2 Jonathan Canter #176 Match data Feb 22, 1989* R64 Philadelphia ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tom Nijssen #827 #87 242 1,678 39 76 33.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jonathan Canter #810 #36 244 1,794 68 96 41.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tom Nijssen Jonathan Canter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1982 3–5 37.5% — 1,506 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 2–5 28.6% #279 1,513 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1984 0–5 0.0% #225 1,464 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1985 16–14 53.3% #73 1,637 0 1
21 1986 0–3 0.0% #396 1,476 0 0 1986 27–22 55.1% #41 1,733 0 1
22 1987 7–9 43.8% #103 1,537 0 0 1987 5–17 22.7% #169 1,601 0 1
23 1988 6–13 31.6% #114 1,545 0 0 1988 2–4 33.3% #182 1,584 0 1
24 1989 12–15 44.4% #99 1,634 0 0 1989 6–13 31.6% #183 1,533 0 1
25 1990 3–13 18.8% #194 1,538 0 0 1990 5–5 50.0% #191 1,559 0 1
26 1991 3–5 37.5% #253 1,570 0 0 1991 0–2 0.0% #408 1,539 0 1
27 1992 4–6 40.0% #221 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1993 4–7 36.4% #235 1,625 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% #190 1,580 0 1
29 1994 0–4 0.0% #591 1,561 0 0 1994 0–3 0.0% #388 1,543 0 1
30 1995 0–1 0.0% #793 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tom Nijssen Jonathan Canter
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 19 11 30 63.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0%
22 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1989 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 1990 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 22 34 35.3% 12 25 37 32.4% 1 7 8 12.5% 14 22 36 38.9% — 47 52 99 47.5% 3 11 14 21.4% 9 15 24 37.5% 9 18 27 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 31/34 of Tom Nijssen's and 8/8 of Jonathan Canter's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tom Nijssen Jonathan Canter
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 7/8 6.6 4.0 47.8% 72.0% 46.8% 48.1% 40.2% 59.7% 33.8% 1991 2/2 1.0 1.5 58.9% 72.4% 42.1% 47.2% 12.5% 59.9% 30.4%
27 1992 9/10 4.6 4.0 50.3% 72.2% 50.9% 64.9% 42.1% 61.9% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 11/11 5.5 2.5 41.9% 71.4% 51.6% 52.2% 39.3% 59.6% 32.3% 1993 3/3 2.3 2.3 48.7% 73.3% 56.6% 45.0% 36.2% 64.8% 38.9%
29 1994 3/4 3.3 3.7 55.4% 68.0% 45.5% 60.8% 38.7% 57.9% 35.0% 1994 3/3 4.3 2.0 54.3% 63.2% 43.6% 56.1% 31.0% 54.5% 36.2%
30 1995 1/1 4.0 8.0 53.3% 71.9% 48.0% 66.7% 33.3% 60.7% 30.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 31/115 5.2 3.6 47.3% 71.4% 49.6% 56.3% 40.0% 60.2% 35.3% — 8/164 2.8 2.0 53.4% 69.3% 48.1% 49.7% 28.3% 59.7% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tom Nijssen Jonathan Canter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1506 102.0 — — — — +34 — — 26.7% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.78
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1513 105.9 — — — — +20 — — 27.8% -1.39 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.20
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1464 104.0 — — — — +10 — — 15.4% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.25
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1637 124.4 — — — — -52 — +5 55.3% +0.49 2–7 (22%) 5–5 (50%) — +2.25
21 1986 1476 105.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.18 1986 1734 139.0 — — — — +15 -236 -104 54.3% +0.18 11–11 (50%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.70
22 1987 1538 116.4 — — — — -6 +19 — 40.5% -1.00 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.55 1987 1602 135.3 — — — — +44 -90 — 31.1% -1.15 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.84
23 1988 1545 122.1 — — — — -25 +50 — 34.0% -0.84 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -0.07 1988 1584 107.3 — — — — +48 — — 31.3% -1.06 1–0 — — -0.02
24 1989 1634 128.9 — — — — +42 -95 -104 44.6% -0.28 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.06 1989 1533 119.1 — — — — +51 — -31 42.6% -0.20 0–7 (0%) 1–7 (13%) — +0.68
25 1990 1539 117.4 — — — — +60 — — 22.9% -1.91 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.78 1990 1559 113.9 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.61 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.78
26 1991 1570 126.0 -0.77 -0.23 0.839 47.2% +46 — — 45.0% -0.35 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.44 1991 1540 106.6 -0.46 +0.70 0.758 45.5% — — — 16.7% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.20
27 1992 1602 126.0 +0.80 +0.57 1.071 51.5% +22 -37 — 48.0% -0.16 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1625 123.0 -1.24 -2.23 0.799 46.3% +2 -52 — 33.3% -1.11 4–1 (80%) 1–3 (25%) — -1.02 1993 1580 116.6 +0.08 +1.04 1.103 51.6% +20 — — 62.5% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.04
29 1994 1562 102.7 -3.16 +0.27 0.830 46.9% — -31 — 27.3% -1.55 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.07 1994 1543 103.5 -1.08 -0.13 0.796 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.29 — 0–2 — -0.22
30 1995 1555 107.4 -2.36 +0.67 0.776 45.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1678 131.2 -0.76 -0.63 0.886 48.1% +25 -13 -104 37.0% -0.86 16–22 (42%) 14–26 (35%) 95.2 -2.12 — 1794 132.1 -0.49 +0.52 0.887 48.0% +18 -163 -19 44.1% -0.29 23–37 (38%) 21–34 (38%) 88.2 +2.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.