H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tom Nijssen vs Pablo Arraya H2H: 2-0
Tom Nijssen holds a 2–0 lead over Pablo Arraya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tom Nijssen leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tom Nijssen won the 1992 Hilversum third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PER
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 1992* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tom Nijssen | 7-5 6-4 | Pablo Arraya | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1988* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Tom Nijssen | 3-6 7-5 6-3 6-2 | Pablo Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Nijssen | #827 | #87 | 242 | 1,678 | 39 | 76 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pablo Arraya | #1,187 | #29 | 348 | 1,821 | 168 | 168 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tom Nijssen | Pablo Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #37 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #39 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #99 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #253 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #221 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #235 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #121 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #793 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #174 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |