H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tom Okker vs Francois Jauffret H2H: 2-1
Tom Okker holds a 2–1 lead over Francois Jauffret in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tom Okker leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Francois Jauffret won the 1975 Monte Carlo Wct third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 84
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 1975* | Monte Carlo Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Francois Jauffret | 6-4 6-0 | Tom Okker | Match data |
| Aug 1, 1969* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Tom Okker | 6-1 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Francois Jauffret | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1968* | Lugano | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Tom Okker | 8-6 6-3 | Francois Jauffret | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Okker | #438 | #3 | 0 | 2,198 | 672 | 279 | 70.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 |
| Francois Jauffret | #662 | #20 | 0 | 1,889 | 194 | 131 | 59.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tom Okker | Francois Jauffret | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 | 1968 | 14–5 | 73.7% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 | 1969 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 | 1970 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 | 1971 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 | 1972 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 | 1973 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #45 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 | 1974 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 | 1975 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 | 1976 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 | 1977 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #58 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #180 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #423 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |