H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tom Okker vs Graham Stilwell H2H: 2-1
Tom Okker holds a 2–1 lead over Graham Stilwell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Tom Okker leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1972 Essen Wct third round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1972* | Essen Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tom Okker | 6-3 7-6 | Graham Stilwell | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1972* | Macon | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Graham Stilwell | 6-3 7-6 | Tom Okker | Match data |
| May 27, 1969* | Rome | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Tom Okker | 6-2 6-4 6-0 | Graham Stilwell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Okker | #438 | #3 | 0 | 2,198 | 672 | 279 | 70.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 |
| Graham Stilwell | #62 | #62 | 0 | 1,734 | 97 | 181 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tom Okker | Graham Stilwell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 15–28 | 34.9% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 | 1971 | 9–32 | 22.0% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 | 1972 | 10–27 | 27.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 | 1973 | 15–33 | 31.2% | #109 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 | 1974 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #128 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 | 1975 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #83 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |