H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tom Okker vs Pat Cramer H2H: 1-0
Tom Okker holds a 1–0 lead over Pat Cramer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tom Okker leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1972 US Open first round 6-2 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1972* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Tom Okker | 6-2 6-3 6-4 | Pat Cramer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Okker | #438 | #3 | 0 | 2,198 | 672 | 279 | 70.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 |
| Pat Cramer | #389 | #95 | 0 | 1,668 | 62 | 103 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tom Okker | Pat Cramer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 | 1972 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 | 1973 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 | 1974 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #160 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 | 1975 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 | 1976 | 2–20 | 9.1% | #191 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #389 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |