H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tom Okker vs Peter Curtis H2H: 3-0
Tom Okker holds a 3–0 lead over Peter Curtis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tom Okker leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1969 Los Angeles second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 1969* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Tom Okker | 6-1 6-2 | Peter Curtis | Match data |
| Sep 7, 1968* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Tom Okker | 8-6 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Peter Curtis | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1968* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Tom Okker | 7-5 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Peter Curtis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Okker | #438 | #3 | 0 | 2,198 | 672 | 279 | 70.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 |
| Peter Curtis | #238 | #235 | 0 | 1,694 | 53 | 76 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tom Okker | Peter Curtis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–15 | 21.1% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 | 1971 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |