H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tom Okker vs Stephen Warboys H2H: 1-0

Tom Okker holds a 1–0 lead over Stephen Warboys in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tom Okker leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1969 Wembley round of 16 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tom Okker
NED Age 82 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Stephen Warboys
GBR Age 72 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tom Okker 6-1 6-1 Stephen Warboys Match data Nov 21, 1969* R16 Wembley ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tom Okker #438 #3 0 2,196 668 278 70.6% 0 0 0 1 33 34
Stephen Warboys #420 #73 0 1,556 24 43 35.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tom Okker Stephen Warboys
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,522 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,530 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1971 3–2 60.0% — 1,530 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1972 3–9 25.0% — 1,492 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1973 5–11 31.2% #187 1,469 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1974 6–7 46.2% #147 1,532 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1975 0–6 0.0% #199 1,485 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1976 1–1 50.0% #248 1,512 0 0
24 1968 89–23 79.5% — 1,793 0 4 — — — — — — —
25 1969 86–25 77.5% — 2,029 0 12 — — — — — — —
26 1970 59–27 68.6% — 1,947 0 17 — — — — — — —
27 1971 74–31 70.5% — 2,012 0 19 — — — — — — —
28 1972 69–31 69.0% — 2,042 0 20 — — — — — — —
29 1973 91–23 79.8% #4 2,171 0 27 — — — — — — —
30 1974 61–18 77.2% #6 2,074 0 30 — — — — — — —
31 1975 39–13 75.0% #11 2,076 0 32 — — — — — — —
32 1976 33–18 64.7% #23 1,962 0 32 — — — — — — —
33 1977 15–13 53.6% #29 1,935 0 33 — — — — — — —
34 1978 20–20 50.0% #50 1,882 0 33 — — — — — — —
35 1979 20–18 52.6% #56 1,774 0 34 — — — — — — —
36 1980 11–13 45.8% #107 1,716 0 34 — — — — — — —
37 1981 1–5 16.7% — 1,652 0 34 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tom Okker Stephen Warboys
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1492 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.27
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1522 105.0 — — — — — — +21 42.9% -1.21 2–0 — — -0.02
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1531 108.6 — — — — — — +17 46.2% -0.08 — — — +0.15
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1531 101.3 — — — — — — +25 60.0% +0.10 0–2 — — +0.61
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1493 106.7 — — — — +67 — +5 30.3% -0.79 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.43
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1469 104.6 — — — — +93 +6 +19 39.5% -0.71 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.91
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1532 111.6 — — — — +49 — -18 45.5% -0.82 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.01
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1486 111.1 — — — — — -58 — 7.7% -2.23 0–1 — — -0.34
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1512 112.3 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.04
24 1968 1794 133.7 — — — — +101 +28 +106 72.8% +1.68 13–8 (62%) — — +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1969 2030 149.0 — — — — +67 +67 -72 73.5% +1.60 14–8 (64%) 2–0 — -4.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1970 1947 145.1 — — — — -16 +206 +16 66.5% +1.16 8–11 (42%) 7–4 (64%) — +2.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1971 2013 159.9 — — — — +69 +10 +75 65.3% +1.09 15–11 (58%) 15–22 (41%) — -6.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1972 2043 156.9 — — — — +57 -30 -5 63.5% +1.01 22–10 (69%) 24–19 (56%) — -5.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1973 2171 158.0 — — — — +40 -10 -158 70.9% +1.31 23–7 (77%) 20–10 (67%) — -4.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1974 2074 157.5 — — — — +132 +65 -20 68.6% +0.99 20–3 (87%) 22–8 (73%) — -4.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1975 2076 152.1 — — — — +76 -53 +48 70.1% +1.53 9–4 (69%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1976 1963 149.2 — — — — +53 -21 +146 61.5% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1977 1936 150.8 — — — — +16 — +174 52.1% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — -2.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1978 1882 150.6 — — — — -30 -29 +247 51.9% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -4.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1979 1774 131.3 — — — — +9 -16 +387 51.0% +0.03 8–5 (62%) 8–8 (50%) — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1980 1717 136.0 — — — — +27 -8 +440 47.5% -0.25 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1981 1653 106.8 — — — — +39 — — 26.7% -1.20 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2196 154.7 — — — — +57 +28 +63 65.9% +1.08 155–88 (64%) 120–88 (58%) 102.9 -3.45 — 1557 112.9 — — — — +67 -31 +10 37.6% -0.88 10–10 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 99.2 +2.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.