H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tom Okker vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 3-0
Tom Okker holds a 3–0 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tom Okker leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1973 Copenhagen Wct third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1973* | Copenhagen Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tom Okker | 6-3 6-4 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1973* | Milan Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tom Okker | 6-3 6-2 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1969* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Tom Okker | 6-2 3-6 6-2 6-0 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Okker | #438 | #3 | 0 | 2,198 | 672 | 279 | 70.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 |
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tom Okker | Vladimir Zednik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |