H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Arnaud Clement H2H: 2-1
Tomas Berdych holds a 2–1 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2007 Cincinnati Masters third round 7-6(1) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2007* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 7-6(1) 7-6(4) | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2007* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-4 6-1 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2005* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Arnaud Clement | 6-3 3-0 (ret.) | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Berdych | Arnaud Clement | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |