H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Benjamin Becker H2H: 6-1

Tomas Berdych holds a 6–1 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–0 on grass and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2016 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-1 6-2.

CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
6 1
7 main draw meetings
GER Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Tomas Berdych #9 6-4 6-1 6-2 Benjamin Becker #102 Match data
Feb 29, 2012* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-2 6-2 Benjamin Becker #155 Match data
Jun 24, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Tomas Berdych #13 7-5 6-3 6-4 Benjamin Becker #71 Match data
Sep 29, 2007* Bangkok ATP 250 SF Hard Benjamin Becker #79 3-6 6-4 6-4 Tomas Berdych #10 Match data
Aug 15, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #12 6-3 6-4 Benjamin Becker #52 Match data
Apr 18, 2007* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tomas Berdych #14 6-1 6-2 Benjamin Becker #47 Match data
Jun 15, 2006* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Tomas Berdych #15 6-4 6-3 Benjamin Becker #173 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Benjamin Becker #1,074 #35 1,098 1,851 153 215 41.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Benjamin Becker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2006 9–8 52.9% #58 1,725 0 0
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2007 21–30 41.2% #84 1,586 0 0
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2008 11–20 35.5% #129 1,642 0 0
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2009 14–19 42.4% #40 1,643 0 1
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2010 30–29 50.8% #53 1,811 0 1
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2011 3–9 25.0% #304 1,724 0 1
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2012 10–14 41.7% #65 1,725 0 1
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2013 9–19 32.1% #79 1,767 0 1
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2014 27–25 51.9% #40 1,835 0 1
34 2015 10–21 32.3% #97 1,732 0 1
35 2016 9–18 33.3% #119 1,734 0 1
36 2017 0–3 0.0% #519 1,591 0 1