H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Benjamin Becker H2H: 6-1

Tomas Berdych holds a 6–1 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–0 on grass and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2016 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Benjamin Becker
GER Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Berdych #9 6-4 6-1 6-2 Benjamin Becker #102 Match data Jun 30, 2016* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tomas Berdych #7 6-2 6-2 Benjamin Becker #155 Match data Feb 29, 2012* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard
Tomas Berdych #13 7-5 6-3 6-4 Benjamin Becker #71 Match data Jun 24, 2010* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Benjamin Becker #79 3-6 6-4 6-4 Tomas Berdych #10 Match data Sep 29, 2007* SF Bangkok International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Tomas Berdych #12 6-3 6-4 Benjamin Becker #52 Match data Aug 15, 2007* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tomas Berdych #14 6-1 6-2 Benjamin Becker #47 Match data Apr 18, 2007* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Tomas Berdych #15 6-4 6-3 Benjamin Becker #173 Match data Jun 15, 2006* R32 Halle Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,233 599 324 64.9% 0 1 0 3 9 13
Benjamin Becker #1,074 #35 1,098 1,848 153 217 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Benjamin Becker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 15–14 51.7% #45 1,699 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,871 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,909 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2008 32–19 62.7% #20 1,924 0 4 — — — — — — —
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,888 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,922 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,082 0 6 2006 9–8 52.9% #58 1,726 0 0
26 2012 52–21 71.2% #6 2,153 0 8 2007 21–30 41.2% #84 1,586 0 0
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,081 0 8 2008 11–20 35.5% #129 1,640 0 0
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,083 0 10 2009 14–19 42.4% #40 1,643 0 1
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,111 0 12 2010 30–29 50.8% #53 1,808 0 1
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2011 3–9 25.0% #304 1,723 0 1
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,029 0 13 2012 10–14 41.7% #65 1,724 0 1
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,921 0 13 2013 9–20 31.0% #79 1,761 0 1
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,873 0 13 2014 27–26 50.9% #40 1,831 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2015 10–21 32.3% #97 1,734 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2016 9–18 33.3% #119 1,735 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–3 0.0% #519 1,602 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Berdych Benjamin Becker
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 7 5 12 58.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 12 14 26 46.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 23 14 37 62.2% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 21 14 35 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 25 14 39 64.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 21 16 37 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 25 19 44 56.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 36 15 51 70.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2006 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 39 14 53 73.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 14 18 32 43.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2013 36 16 52 69.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2008 9 13 22 40.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
28 2014 38 15 53 71.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 6 16 22 27.3% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
29 2015 40 16 56 71.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2010 20 21 41 48.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
30 2016 27 13 40 67.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 17 10 27 63.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 2018 10 6 16 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 6 16 22 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
33 2019 13 8 21 61.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 20 18 38 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 8 14 22 36.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 391 211 602 65.0% 131 79 210 62.4% 68 31 99 68.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — 105 151 256 41.0% 11 34 45 24.4% 36 30 66 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 909/923 of Tomas Berdych's and 368/370 of Benjamin Becker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Berdych Benjamin Becker
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 3/3 13.3 4.7 56.4% 72.9% 52.7% 68.7% 29.2% 64.3% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 25/29 7.5 3.8 58.1% 72.3% 47.6% 55.4% 42.0% 62.1% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 57/57 7.6 2.8 57.3% 74.0% 51.4% 56.0% 44.2% 64.3% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 66/66 7.6 2.8 58.6% 76.0% 52.3% 57.2% 43.6% 65.9% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 62/63 7.7 2.3 58.9% 78.4% 55.0% 65.5% 48.9% 68.9% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 48/51 8.0 2.1 60.3% 76.4% 55.0% 62.4% 46.9% 67.9% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 57/57 6.8 2.5 58.9% 74.3% 52.7% 60.4% 39.3% 65.5% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 65/65 8.1 2.4 56.4% 79.6% 56.8% 64.4% 43.0% 69.6% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 73/74 6.6 2.0 58.1% 77.7% 54.4% 53.0% 43.8% 67.8% 40.5% 2006 17/17 12.8 3.5 54.7% 80.0% 53.5% 61.7% 33.8% 68.4% 33.2%
26 2012 72/73 8.5 2.3 58.8% 78.5% 55.1% 67.5% 45.3% 68.8% 39.5% 2007 51/51 8.2 3.1 51.8% 76.3% 52.1% 66.5% 30.1% 64.5% 32.2%
27 2013 74/75 8.1 2.3 58.6% 78.0% 52.4% 64.1% 43.5% 67.5% 40.0% 2008 31/31 8.9 3.0 52.6% 75.0% 50.0% 60.3% 41.1% 63.2% 33.3%
28 2014 74/75 8.2 2.6 57.5% 78.8% 54.9% 65.2% 41.6% 68.6% 39.1% 2009 33/33 9.0 2.2 57.5% 76.2% 51.3% 47.2% 48.7% 65.7% 32.1%
29 2015 79/79 7.4 2.0 56.6% 78.0% 55.5% 60.4% 48.5% 68.3% 39.9% 2010 58/59 7.9 2.7 57.9% 76.7% 51.0% 57.2% 40.4% 65.9% 36.0%
30 2016 57/58 8.4 3.0 57.1% 78.0% 50.4% 58.8% 40.7% 66.2% 36.6% 2011 12/12 7.3 2.8 54.1% 78.4% 52.0% 55.5% 37.3% 66.1% 30.9%
31 2017 53/53 7.8 2.4 57.8% 78.9% 55.1% 66.9% 51.8% 68.8% 36.1% 2012 24/24 7.3 3.0 54.3% 70.9% 49.7% 50.5% 38.3% 61.3% 34.8%
32 2018 22/23 8.2 1.9 60.3% 76.5% 50.0% 66.5% 38.8% 66.2% 37.0% 2013 29/29 7.3 3.1 57.0% 73.6% 48.0% 52.8% 39.6% 62.5% 32.0%
33 2019 22/22 6.7 2.5 59.0% 75.2% 51.5% 64.8% 39.7% 65.4% 36.8% 2014 53/53 6.2 2.9 58.4% 74.0% 50.0% 59.1% 37.3% 63.9% 35.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 30/31 7.0 3.2 60.6% 70.9% 48.5% 57.4% 42.2% 62.0% 31.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 27/27 5.3 2.8 61.2% 69.9% 44.2% 45.4% 31.3% 60.1% 34.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 3/3 5.3 4.7 58.2% 70.8% 41.4% 33.3% 34.3% 58.8% 35.0%
Career — 909/923 7.8 2.5 58.1% 77.3% 53.6% 61.7% 44.3% 67.4% 38.6% — 368/370 7.7 2.9 56.5% 74.6% 50.0% 56.5% 38.1% 63.9% 33.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Berdych Benjamin Becker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1526 108.9 +0.33 -1.90 0.983 49.1% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1699 136.0 +0.40 +0.09 0.997 50.0% -15 -38 — 48.1% -0.08 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1871 147.6 +2.21 -0.32 1.012 50.3% -3 -159 -286 54.1% +0.29 12–11 (52%) 13–14 (48%) — -2.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1934 149.9 +3.95 +1.79 1.142 52.2% -25 -144 -133 59.6% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1909 153.2 +5.09 +1.51 1.210 53.2% -28 -81 +50 65.3% +1.03 6–5 (55%) 20–12 (63%) — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1924 157.2 +4.14 +2.63 1.197 53.0% +18 -89 +16 61.1% +0.86 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1889 149.6 +1.93 +1.34 1.088 51.1% +8 -68 +89 56.1% +0.35 13–11 (54%) 14–8 (64%) — +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1922 165.7 +5.92 +4.41 1.325 54.2% -60 +13 +227 62.2% +1.05 10–12 (45%) 10–15 (40%) — +0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 2083 169.8 +5.45 +3.99 1.258 54.0% +29 -160 +53 69.2% +1.41 11–7 (61%) 13–7 (65%) — +2.97 2006 1727 131.5 +4.00 -1.34 1.052 50.5% -16 — -89 52.2% +0.28 3–1 (75%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.39
26 2012 2154 175.6 +5.87 +4.18 1.263 54.1% +29 -74 -142 66.3% +1.18 12–7 (63%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.55 2007 1586 123.7 -0.11 -2.84 0.906 48.3% +35 -110 +5 43.0% -0.55 5–7 (42%) 14–12 (54%) — +1.96
27 2013 2082 173.8 +4.74 +4.38 1.231 53.4% +45 -31 -22 67.2% +1.15 9–11 (45%) 17–17 (50%) — +0.42 2008 1641 125.7 +0.57 -2.80 0.905 48.2% +40 -198 -53 36.5% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 3–13 (19%) — +0.69
28 2014 2084 170.2 +4.10 +3.96 1.243 53.3% +44 -21 -19 68.2% +1.12 9–9 (50%) 9–16 (36%) — +3.87 2009 1644 132.3 +1.65 -2.97 0.936 49.1% -43 — +148 43.6% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.84
29 2015 2112 176.1 +5.06 +4.69 1.258 53.9% +44 +48 -47 67.7% +1.11 9–5 (64%) 24–10 (71%) — +2.13 2010 1809 142.6 +2.02 -0.41 1.058 50.6% -11 -338 +42 48.5% +0.02 6–7 (46%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.59
30 2016 2081 169.7 +3.41 +1.04 1.085 51.4% +7 +79 +38 60.9% +0.72 11–3 (79%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.93 2011 1724 129.0 +0.80 -3.08 0.912 48.3% -14 — — 31.0% -0.62 1–1 2–7 (22%) — -0.87
31 2017 2029 162.0 +4.46 +0.86 1.159 52.5% -34 +39 +113 61.1% +0.67 7–8 (47%) 16–13 (55%) — -1.68 2012 1724 136.6 -1.52 -0.33 0.901 48.3% -1 — +165 41.1% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — 0.00
32 2018 1922 155.3 +2.29 +0.98 1.096 51.6% +93 +39 +185 53.4% +0.60 1–6 (14%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.07 2013 1761 143.4 -0.06 -2.70 0.853 47.4% -12 — +158 35.5% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 7–11 (39%) — -2.02
33 2019 1873 152.7 +1.30 +0.72 1.063 51.0% +63 — — 55.0% +0.40 5–3 (63%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.94 2014 1832 144.8 -0.11 -0.42 0.980 49.7% -14 -338 +56 47.2% -0.16 9–6 (60%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.66
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1734 136.6 -2.43 -2.38 0.837 47.2% -2 -183 — 38.8% -0.93 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1735 129.7 -2.90 -1.85 0.853 47.0% +10 -190 +45 36.4% -0.88 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.04
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1602 105.6 -0.43 -2.63 0.850 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.17 — 0–1 — +0.26
Career — 2233 169.6 +4.17 +2.64 1.181 52.7% +14 -50 +11 62.3% +0.85 135–115 (54%) 200–177 (53%) 97.9 +0.51 — 1849 140.2 +0.18 -1.77 0.932 48.8% -2 -223 +64 42.1% -0.45 46–54 (46%) 69–102 (40%) 92.8 +0.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.