H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Chris Guccione H2H: 1-2

Chris Guccione holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Berdych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chris Guccione leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2009 Cincinnati Open third round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Chris Guccione
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Berdych #18 6-4 6-3 Chris Guccione #124 Match data Aug 21, 2009* R16 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Chris Guccione #132 6-3 6-4 Tomas Berdych #21 Match data Jan 15, 2009* R32 Sydney International ATP 250 Hard
Chris Guccione #125 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 Tomas Berdych #14 Match data Jan 12, 2008* QF Sydney International International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,233 599 324 64.9% 0 1 0 3 9 13
Chris Guccione #986 #67 926 1,681 36 59 37.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Chris Guccione
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 2003 2–2 50.0% #462 1,482 0 0
18 2004 15–14 51.7% #45 1,699 0 1 2004 2–2 50.0% #281 1,540 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,871 0 2 2005 3–3 50.0% #155 1,586 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2006 1–3 25.0% #153 1,543 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,909 0 3 2007 8–15 34.8% #91 1,524 0 0
22 2008 32–19 62.7% #20 1,924 0 4 2008 11–18 37.9% #96 1,560 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,888 0 5 2009 7–8 46.7% #136 1,619 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,922 0 5 2010 0–2 0.0% #376 1,554 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,082 0 6 2011 1–3 25.0% #256 1,584 0 0
26 2012 52–21 71.2% #6 2,153 0 8 2012 0–1 0.0% #570 1,644 0 0
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,081 0 8 2013 1–1 50.0% #520 1,640 0 0
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,083 0 10 2014 0–1 0.0% #980 1,664 0 0
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,111 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,029 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,921 0 13 — — — — — — —
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,873 0 13 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Berdych Chris Guccione
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 2004 7 5 12 58.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 12 14 26 46.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 2006 23 14 37 62.2% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 21 14 35 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2007 6 9 15 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 2008 25 14 39 64.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2009 21 16 37 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2010 25 19 44 56.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2010 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 36 15 51 70.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 39 14 53 73.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 36 16 52 69.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 38 15 53 71.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2015 40 16 56 71.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 27 13 40 67.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 17 10 27 63.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 10 6 16 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 13 8 21 61.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 391 211 602 65.0% 131 79 210 62.4% 68 31 99 68.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — 29 41 70 41.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 12 18 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 909/923 of Tomas Berdych's and 94/95 of Chris Guccione's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Berdych Chris Guccione
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 3/3 13.3 4.7 56.4% 72.9% 52.7% 68.7% 29.2% 64.3% 35.1% 2003 4/4 18.0 5.5 59.7% 83.3% 51.5% 76.8% 50.0% 70.5% 33.2%
18 2004 25/29 7.5 3.8 58.1% 72.3% 47.6% 55.4% 42.0% 62.1% 37.8% 2004 4/4 12.0 3.0 55.7% 84.5% 53.8% 74.2% 26.2% 71.2% 28.2%
19 2005 57/57 7.6 2.8 57.3% 74.0% 51.4% 56.0% 44.2% 64.3% 36.2% 2005 6/6 12.8 4.5 58.1% 76.4% 54.5% 33.9% 17.5% 67.3% 32.2%
20 2006 66/66 7.6 2.8 58.6% 76.0% 52.3% 57.2% 43.6% 65.9% 38.9% 2006 4/4 19.8 4.8 59.3% 76.5% 44.7% 58.0% 41.7% 63.5% 26.2%
21 2007 62/63 7.7 2.3 58.9% 78.4% 55.0% 65.5% 48.9% 68.9% 37.7% 2007 23/23 15.7 3.6 58.3% 78.3% 53.8% 65.4% 26.3% 68.0% 28.5%
22 2008 48/51 8.0 2.1 60.3% 76.4% 55.0% 62.4% 46.9% 67.9% 38.5% 2008 28/29 14.9 2.6 62.0% 79.7% 52.6% 72.1% 36.1% 69.4% 26.6%
23 2009 57/57 6.8 2.5 58.9% 74.3% 52.7% 60.4% 39.3% 65.5% 37.5% 2009 15/15 13.7 3.4 59.7% 79.1% 49.9% 67.5% 36.4% 67.8% 29.2%
24 2010 65/65 8.1 2.4 56.4% 79.6% 56.8% 64.4% 43.0% 69.6% 40.2% 2010 2/2 12.5 1.0 63.6% 74.2% 59.8% 65.0% 0.0% 69.6% 19.6%
25 2011 73/74 6.6 2.0 58.1% 77.7% 54.4% 53.0% 43.8% 67.8% 40.5% 2011 4/4 13.0 3.5 60.3% 80.8% 46.3% 82.6% 56.3% 67.3% 30.0%
26 2012 72/73 8.5 2.3 58.8% 78.5% 55.1% 67.5% 45.3% 68.8% 39.5% 2012 1/1 7.0 6.0 53.9% 68.8% 43.9% 20.0% 40.0% 57.3% 33.3%
27 2013 74/75 8.1 2.3 58.6% 78.0% 52.4% 64.1% 43.5% 67.5% 40.0% 2013 2/2 8.5 2.0 72.0% 90.6% 51.5% 50.0% 54.2% 79.0% 45.8%
28 2014 74/75 8.2 2.6 57.5% 78.8% 54.9% 65.2% 41.6% 68.6% 39.1% 2014 1/1 13.0 1.0 64.7% 81.8% 41.7% 66.7% 0.0% 67.6% 18.0%
29 2015 79/79 7.4 2.0 56.6% 78.0% 55.5% 60.4% 48.5% 68.3% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 57/58 8.4 3.0 57.1% 78.0% 50.4% 58.8% 40.7% 66.2% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 53/53 7.8 2.4 57.8% 78.9% 55.1% 66.9% 51.8% 68.8% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 22/23 8.2 1.9 60.3% 76.5% 50.0% 66.5% 38.8% 66.2% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 22/22 6.7 2.5 59.0% 75.2% 51.5% 64.8% 39.7% 65.4% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 909/923 7.8 2.5 58.1% 77.3% 53.6% 61.7% 44.3% 67.4% 38.6% — 94/95 14.6 3.3 60.1% 79.3% 51.9% 66.2% 33.1% 68.5% 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Berdych Chris Guccione
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1526 108.9 +0.33 -1.90 0.983 49.1% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.09 2003 1483 106.2 +0.35 -0.92 1.125 52.1% — — — 60.0% +0.50 0–2 4–1 (80%) — +0.38
18 2004 1699 136.0 +0.40 +0.09 0.997 50.0% -15 -38 — 48.1% -0.08 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.26 2004 1540 116.2 +1.58 -2.45 0.978 50.0% +18 — — 50.0% +0.10 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.04
19 2005 1871 147.6 +2.21 -0.32 1.012 50.3% -3 -159 -286 54.1% +0.29 12–11 (52%) 13–14 (48%) — -2.61 2005 1586 111.9 +2.37 -2.26 0.985 48.7% — — +20 42.1% -0.63 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
20 2006 1934 149.9 +3.95 +1.79 1.142 52.2% -25 -144 -133 59.6% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.19 2006 1543 108.6 +0.30 -2.26 0.719 46.7% -25 — — 20.0% -0.90 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.30
21 2007 1909 153.2 +5.09 +1.51 1.210 53.2% -28 -81 +50 65.3% +1.03 6–5 (55%) 20–12 (63%) — +1.36 2007 1525 119.6 +2.74 -5.40 0.891 48.7% +37 -14 +27 40.3% -0.56 3–6 (33%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.16
22 2008 1924 157.2 +4.14 +2.63 1.197 53.0% +18 -89 +16 61.1% +0.86 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.54 2008 1560 127.5 +4.75 -7.05 0.870 48.4% +42 — -45 39.2% -0.72 4–4 (50%) 14–12 (54%) — 0.00
23 2009 1889 149.6 +1.93 +1.34 1.088 51.1% +8 -68 +89 56.1% +0.35 13–11 (54%) 14–8 (64%) — +1.55 2009 1619 133.1 +3.06 -3.98 0.906 49.1% +72 — — 47.2% -0.31 1–1 6–7 (46%) — +0.12
24 2010 1922 165.7 +5.92 +4.41 1.325 54.2% -60 +13 +227 62.2% +1.05 10–12 (45%) 10–15 (40%) — +0.74 2010 1554 99.5 +0.96 -3.80 0.646 45.7% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.21
25 2011 2083 169.8 +5.45 +3.99 1.258 54.0% +29 -160 +53 69.2% +1.41 11–7 (61%) 13–7 (65%) — +2.97 2011 1585 114.2 +0.83 -1.90 0.916 49.0% +83 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.34
26 2012 2154 175.6 +5.87 +4.18 1.263 54.1% +29 -74 -142 66.3% +1.18 12–7 (63%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.55 2012 1645 118.7 -1.04 -2.78 0.781 46.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.03
27 2013 2082 173.8 +4.74 +4.38 1.231 53.4% +45 -31 -22 67.2% +1.15 9–11 (45%) 17–17 (50%) — +0.42 2013 1640 108.4 0.00 +0.05 2.183 61.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.18
28 2014 2084 170.2 +4.10 +3.96 1.243 53.3% +44 -21 -19 68.2% +1.12 9–9 (50%) 9–16 (36%) — +3.87 2014 1665 108.1 +3.55 -2.62 0.557 44.2% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.14
29 2015 2112 176.1 +5.06 +4.69 1.258 53.9% +44 +48 -47 67.7% +1.11 9–5 (64%) 24–10 (71%) — +2.13 2015 1605 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 2081 169.7 +3.41 +1.04 1.085 51.4% +7 +79 +38 60.9% +0.72 11–3 (79%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 2029 162.0 +4.46 +0.86 1.159 52.5% -34 +39 +113 61.1% +0.67 7–8 (47%) 16–13 (55%) — -1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1922 155.3 +2.29 +0.98 1.096 51.6% +93 +39 +185 53.4% +0.60 1–6 (14%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1873 152.7 +1.30 +0.72 1.063 51.0% +63 — — 55.0% +0.40 5–3 (63%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2233 169.6 +4.17 +2.64 1.181 52.7% +14 -50 +11 62.3% +0.85 135–115 (54%) 200–177 (53%) 97.9 +0.51 — 1682 125.4 +2.90 -4.66 0.907 48.9% +44 -14 +1 40.6% -0.54 11–19 (37%) 41–41 (50%) 100.6 -0.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.