H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs David Nalbandian H2H: 0-4

David Nalbandian holds a 4–0 lead over Tomas Berdych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2008 Madrid Masters third round 6-2 6-7(5) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 15, 2008* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #7 6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 Tomas Berdych #22 Match data
Oct 18, 2007* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #25 4-6 6-4 7-6(2) Tomas Berdych #11 Match data
Mar 23, 2006* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Nalbandian #3 6-7(3) 6-1 6-0 Tomas Berdych #27 Match data
May 27, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay David Nalbandian #11 6-3 6-2 6-1 Tomas Berdych #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych David Nalbandian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 — — — — — — —
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 — — — — — — —