H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Denis Istomin H2H: 6-0

Tomas Berdych holds a 6–0 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2017 Madrid Masters second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Denis Istomin
UZB Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 2017* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tomas Berdych #14 6-4 6-4 Denis Istomin #85 Match data
May 4, 2016* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tomas Berdych #8 6-3 6-3 Denis Istomin #79 Match data
Jan 7, 2015* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-1 6-4 Denis Istomin #48 Match data
May 15, 2013* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tomas Berdych #6 6-4 6-0 Denis Istomin #45 Match data
Oct 1, 2010* Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-4 6-3 Denis Istomin #43 Match data
Jun 27, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Tomas Berdych #13 6-7(1) 7-6(5) 6-7(8) 6-3 6-4 Denis Istomin #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,900 191 245 43.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Denis Istomin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,636 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2012 26–29 47.3% #43 1,732 0 0
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,808 0 0
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2014 24–23 51.1% #49 1,853 0 0
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,788 0 1
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2016 6–19 24.0% #121 1,711 0 1
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,724 0 2
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,679 0 2
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,567 0 2
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,545 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 0–2 0.0% #254 1,545 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,577 0 2