H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 4-3

Tomas Berdych holds a 4–3 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2014 Roland Garros quarterfinal 6-3 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 5, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Ernests Gulbis #17 6-3 6-2 6-4 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
Feb 15, 2014* Rotterdam ATP 500 SF Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-3 6-2 Ernests Gulbis #24 Match data
Feb 22, 2013* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #6 6-4 6-7(10) 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #118 Match data
Jun 27, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Ernests Gulbis #87 7-6(5) 7-6(4) 7-6(4) Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
May 20, 2011* Nice ATP 250 QF Clay Tomas Berdych #6 6-1 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #85 Match data
Feb 20, 2010* Memphis ATP 250 QF Hard Ernests Gulbis #99 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) Tomas Berdych #23 Match data
Aug 5, 2009* Washington ATP 500 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #18 6-2 7-6(6) Ernests Gulbis #101 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 — — — — — — —