H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Fabio Fognini H2H: 3-2

Tomas Berdych holds a 3–2 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Fabio Fognini leads 2–1 on clay, while Tomas Berdych leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2018 Australian Open fourth round 6-1 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Fabio Fognini
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 23, 2018* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #20 6-1 6-4 6-4 Fabio Fognini #25 Match data
May 15, 2015* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Tomas Berdych #5 6-3 3-6 7-6(2) Fabio Fognini #31 Match data
Apr 19, 2013* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Fabio Fognini #32 6-4 6-2 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
Sep 1, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #9 7-5 6-0 6-0 Fabio Fognini #38 Match data
Apr 14, 2009* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fabio Fognini #108 1-6 6-3 6-3 Tomas Berdych #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 398 382 51.0% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Fabio Fognini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,600 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,612 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,702 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,725 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2012 21–23 47.7% #45 1,763 0 0
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,932 0 2
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2016 23–21 52.3% #49 1,864 0 4
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,945 0 5
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,949 0 8
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,911 0 9
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,800 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 2021 18–21 46.2% #37 1,766 0 9
35 — — — — — — — 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,700 0 9
36 — — — — — — — 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,690 0 9
37 — — — — — — — 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,675 0 9
38 — — — — — — — 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,577 0 9