H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 4-0

Tomas Berdych holds a 4–0 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2007 Halle fourth round 6-3 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 15, 2007* Halle ATP 500 R16 Grass Tomas Berdych #13 6-3 7-6(5) Fabrice Santoro #53 Match data
Jun 30, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Tomas Berdych #14 6-4 6-7(6) 2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #45 Match data
Jun 17, 2006* Halle ATP 250 QF Grass Tomas Berdych #15 7-5 7-6(3) Fabrice Santoro #49 Match data
Apr 19, 2006* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tomas Berdych #24 6-2 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6