H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 6-8
Feliciano Lopez holds a 8–6 lead over Tomas Berdych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, they are tied 4–4 on hard courts, while Tomas Berdych leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2019 Indian Wells Masters first round 7-6(3) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
6
–
8
14 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2019* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 7-6(3) 7-6(2) | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2017* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Feliciano Lopez | 7-6(5) 6-7(1) 7-5 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2017* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Feliciano Lopez | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Oct 31, 2014* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 7-5 6-3 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2014* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-1 6-2 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2014* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2014* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | QF | Grass | Feliciano Lopez | 6-4 7-6(7) | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2013* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2011* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 6-4 6-4 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2010* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 6-1 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2008* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 6-2 7-5 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2007* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2007* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Feliciano Lopez | 6-0 6-3 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| May 31, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 6-2 6-4 6-3 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Feliciano Lopez | #672 | #12 | 2,415 | 2,013 | 497 | 477 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Berdych | Feliciano Lopez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #159 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #62 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #28 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #47 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | 2011 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #20 | 1,968 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #40 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | 2013 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | 2014 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #14 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 2015 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #17 | 1,943 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #28 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #64 | 1,817 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #62 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #64 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #106 | 1,595 | 0 | 7 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,468 | 0 | 7 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #468 | 1,517 | 0 | 7 |