H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Fernando Gonzalez H2H: 3-4

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 4–3 lead over Tomas Berdych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2009 US Open third round 7-5 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 6, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #11 7-5 6-4 6-4 Tomas Berdych #18 Match data
Aug 18, 2009* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #18 6-4 (ret.) Fernando Gonzalez #12 Match data
Oct 4, 2008* Tokyo ATP 500 QF Hard Tomas Berdych #27 6-0 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #11 Match data
Jul 30, 2008* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #21 6-3 3-6 6-3 Fernando Gonzalez #15 Match data
Oct 22, 2006* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Fernando Gonzalez #10 6-3 6-1 Tomas Berdych #11 Match data
May 13, 2006* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #9 6-2 6-4 Tomas Berdych #21 Match data
Oct 13, 2005* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #20 6-2 6-2 Tomas Berdych #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Fernando Gonzalez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 — — — — — — —
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 — — — — — — —