H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 11-4
Tomas Berdych holds a 11–4 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 8–1 on hard courts and 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2019 Doha fourth round 4-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
11
–
4
15 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 42
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2019* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| May 12, 2012* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 6-1 6-2 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Nov 10, 2011* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 7-5 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2011* | Beijing | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-1 6-0 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Jan 25, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-4 6-2 6-3 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Apr 16, 2010* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Apr 2, 2010* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Mar 16, 2010* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-0 6-3 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2009* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 7-5 5-7 6-4 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2008* | Bastad | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Fernando Verdasco | 6-4 6-4 6-0 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2007* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 7-6(7) 4-6 7-5 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2007* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 7-6(2) 6-1 7-6(3) | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| May 16, 2007* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2005* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Fernando Verdasco | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Fernando Verdasco | #893 | #7 | 3,900 | 2,125 | 549 | 441 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Berdych | Fernando Verdasco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #26 | 1,864 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 45–27 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | 2013 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #30 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #49 | 1,822 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | 2016 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #42 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 2017 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #49 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #651 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 |