H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Gilles Muller H2H: 1-1

Tomas Berdych and Gilles Muller are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2017 Miami Masters third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 27, 2017* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #14 6-3 6-4 Gilles Muller #29 Match data
Oct 6, 2016* Tokyo ATP 500 R32 Hard Gilles Muller #36 7-6(7) 6-1 Tomas Berdych #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,071 200 199 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,599 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,727 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,535 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,578 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,675 0 0
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,634 0 0
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,612 0 0
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2012 20–20 50.0% #67 1,834 0 0
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,691 0 0
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,743 0 0
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2016 33–23 58.9% #34 1,956 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,939 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,687 0 2