H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 5-3

Tomas Berdych holds a 5–3 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2018 Australian Open second round 6-3 2-6 6-2 6-3.

CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 2018* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #20 6-3 2-6 6-2 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #71 Match data
Oct 4, 2015* Shenzhen ATP 250 F Hard Tomas Berdych #5 6-3 7-6(7) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #29 Match data
Sep 6, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #6 6-7(2) 7-6(7) 6-3 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #31 Match data
Apr 18, 2014* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #38 4-6 6-3 6-1 Tomas Berdych #5 Match data
Feb 10, 2011* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-1 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #26 Match data
Oct 15, 2010* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #35 7-6(4) 6-3 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
May 12, 2009* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tomas Berdych #22 6-0 7-6(5) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #77 Match data
May 30, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #64 7-5 6-4 6-4 Tomas Berdych #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5