H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 2-0
Tomas Berdych holds a 2–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2007 Wimbledon third round 6-4 7-6(2) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Tomas Berdych | 6-4 7-6(2) 7-6(3) | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-1 6-2 6-2 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tomas Berdych | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |