H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Igor Kunitsyn H2H: 1-1
Tomas Berdych and Igor Kunitsyn are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Igor Kunitsyn leads 1–0 on carpet, while Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2009 Kuala Lumpur third round 6-1 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2009* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Igor Kunitsyn | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2004* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Igor Kunitsyn | 6-3 6-4 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Igor Kunitsyn | #1,093 | #35 | 1,562 | 1,755 | 87 | 149 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Berdych | Igor Kunitsyn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #129 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #47 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 16–30 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #100 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | 2011 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | 2012 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #162 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |