H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Ivan Ljubicic H2H: 2-3

Ivan Ljubicic holds a 3–2 lead over Tomas Berdych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ivan Ljubicic leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2011 Monte Carlo Masters fourth round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Ivan Ljubicic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 15, 2011* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Ivan Ljubicic #40 6-4 6-2 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Feb 21, 2008* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #12 6-3 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #23 Match data
Nov 7, 2005* Paris Masters Masters 1000 F Carpet Tomas Berdych #25 6-3 6-4 3-6 4-6 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #8 Match data
Mar 10, 2005* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #13 6-4 6-1 Tomas Berdych #48 Match data
Oct 20, 2004* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #29 6-4 6-4 Tomas Berdych #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Ivan Ljubicic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10