H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 3-5

Ivo Karlovic holds a 5–3 lead over Tomas Berdych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Ivo Karlovic leads 4–3 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2015 Halle quarterfinal 7-5 6-7(8) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 – 5
8 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 2015* Halle ATP 500 QF Grass Ivo Karlovic #27 7-5 6-7(8) 6-3 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
Oct 10, 2014* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-3 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #31 Match data
Jan 1, 2014* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Ivo Karlovic #78 7-6(7) 7-6(4) Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Oct 24, 2013* Basel ATP 500 R32 Hard Ivo Karlovic #83 4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(2) Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Aug 12, 2011* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #9 6-3 7-6(2) Ivo Karlovic #125 Match data
Feb 22, 2008* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Ivo Karlovic #24 6-4 6-4 Tomas Berdych #12 Match data
Oct 27, 2007* Basel ATP 500 QF Hard Ivo Karlovic #25 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 7-6(13) Tomas Berdych #13 Match data
Sep 29, 2007* Bangkok ATP 250 QF Hard Tomas Berdych #10 7-5 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8