H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 2-3

Janko Tipsarevic holds a 3–2 lead over Tomas Berdych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Janko Tipsarevic leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2011 Tour Finals round-robin match 2-6 6-3 7-6(6).

CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 20, 2011 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Tomas Berdych #7 2-6 6-3 7-6(6) Janko Tipsarevic #9 Match data
Nov 11, 2011* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 7-5 6-4 Janko Tipsarevic #13 Match data
Sep 4, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Janko Tipsarevic #20 6-4 5-0 (ret.) Tomas Berdych #9 Match data
Aug 13, 2011* Canada Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Janko Tipsarevic #24 6-4 6-4 Tomas Berdych #9 Match data
Oct 28, 2004* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Janko Tipsarevic #126 3-6 7-5 6-1 Tomas Berdych #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,072 245 240 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Janko Tipsarevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,551 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,543 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2008 24–21 53.3% #49 1,727 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,818 0 0
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,807 0 0
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,006 0 2
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2012 48–26 64.9% #9 1,972 0 3
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2013 19–22 46.3% #36 1,778 0 4
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,693 0 4
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,748 0 4
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,666 0 4
35 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4