H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 7-1

Tomas Berdych holds a 7–1 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2013 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-3 6-2.

CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
7 1
8 main draw meetings
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 14, 2013* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #6 6-3 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #39 Match data
Aug 23, 2012* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-3 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #42 Match data
May 13, 2011* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Tomas Berdych #7 6-2 6-7(4) 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #59 Match data
Oct 22, 2010* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #45 6-1 6-4 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
Feb 12, 2010* San Jose ATP 250 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #23 6-3 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #129 Match data
Jul 23, 2008* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #21 6-3 6-1 Jarkko Nieminen #29 Match data
Jun 16, 2007* Halle ATP 500 SF Grass Tomas Berdych #13 7-6(5) 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #22 Match data
May 9, 2007* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tomas Berdych #12 6-4 7-5 Jarkko Nieminen #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Jarkko Nieminen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2