H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs John Isner H2H: 6-2

Tomas Berdych holds a 6–2 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–2 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2015 Madrid Masters quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(7) 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 2015* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Tomas Berdych #7 3-6 7-6(7) 7-6(1) John Isner #18 Match data
Oct 4, 2014* Beijing ATP 500 QF Hard Tomas Berdych #6 6-1 6-4 John Isner #15 Match data
Jun 3, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Tomas Berdych #6 6-4 6-4 6-4 John Isner #11 Match data
Mar 26, 2014* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-3 7-5 John Isner #10 Match data
Oct 5, 2013* Beijing ATP 500 QF Hard Tomas Berdych #5 7-5 6-2 John Isner #16 Match data
Aug 25, 2012* Winston-Salem ATP 250 F Hard John Isner #10 3-6 6-4 7-6(9) Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
May 30, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Tomas Berdych #17 6-2 6-2 6-1 John Isner #19 Match data
Aug 8, 2009* Washington ATP 500 QF Hard John Isner #80 6-3 6-7(10) 6-2 Tomas Berdych #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych John Isner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14
34 — — — — — — — 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15
35 — — — — — — — 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16
37 — — — — — — — 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16