H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Juan Carlos Ferrero H2H: 2-0
Tomas Berdych holds a 2–0 lead over Juan Carlos Ferrero in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2008 Miami Masters third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2008* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-1 6-3 | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Match data |
| Nov 5, 2005* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Tomas Berdych | 7-5 6-7(7) 6-4 | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Juan Carlos Ferrero | #968 | #1 | 4,570 | 2,096 | 457 | 254 | 64.3% | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Berdych | Juan Carlos Ferrero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 16–8 | 66.7% | #42 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #4 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #3 | 2,005 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #31 | 1,751 | 1 | 11 |
| 25 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,841 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,740 | 1 | 11 |
| 27 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,833 | 1 | 11 |
| 28 | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #55 | 1,845 | 1 | 11 |
| 29 | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | 2009 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,924 | 1 | 12 |
| 30 | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | 2010 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #29 | 1,887 | 1 | 15 |
| 31 | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | 2011 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #50 | 1,924 | 1 | 16 |
| 32 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,794 | 1 | 16 |
| 33 | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |