H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Juan Martin del Potro H2H: 4-4

Tomas Berdych and Juan Martin del Potro are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Juan Martin del Potro leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2018 Australian Open third round 6-3 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main-draw meetings
Juan Martin del Potro
ARG Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Berdych #20 6-3 6-3 6-2 Juan Martin del Potro #10 Match data Jan 21, 2018* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Juan Martin del Potro #30 3-6 7-6(1) 6-0 Tomas Berdych #15 Match data Aug 15, 2017* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tomas Berdych #7 7-6(4) 6-2 Juan Martin del Potro #420 Match data Mar 13, 2016* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Juan Martin del Potro #9 7-6(6) 1-6 6-3 7-5 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data Jun 5, 2012* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Tomas Berdych #7 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Juan Martin del Potro #11 Match data May 12, 2012* SF Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Juan Martin del Potro #10 6-3 6-1 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data Feb 18, 2012* SF ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard
Juan Martin del Potro #5 6-2 4-1 (ret.) Tomas Berdych #22 Match data May 13, 2009* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Tomas Berdych #27 6-1 6-4 Juan Martin del Potro #12 Match data Oct 5, 2008* F Japan Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,233 599 324 64.9% 0 1 0 3 9 13
Juan Martin del Potro #761 #3 6,825 2,271 426 174 71.0% 1 1 0 9 11 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Juan Martin del Potro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 2006 10–12 45.5% #92 1,634 0 0
18 2004 15–14 51.7% #45 1,699 0 1 2007 26–24 52.0% #44 1,785 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,871 0 2 2008 44–16 73.3% #9 1,990 0 4
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2009 51–16 76.1% #5 2,199 1 7
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,909 0 3 2010 3–3 50.0% #258 2,118 1 7
22 2008 32–19 62.7% #20 1,924 0 4 2011 46–17 73.0% #11 2,045 1 9
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,888 0 5 2012 62–17 78.5% #7 2,228 1 13
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,922 0 5 2013 52–16 76.5% #5 2,208 1 17
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,082 0 6 2014 7–3 70.0% #137 2,138 1 18
26 2012 52–21 71.2% #6 2,153 0 8 2015 2–2 50.0% #590 2,091 1 18
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,081 0 8 2016 29–12 70.7% #38 2,151 1 19
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,083 0 10 2017 38–17 69.1% #11 2,174 1 20
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,111 0 12 2018 48–13 78.7% #5 2,189 1 22
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2019 8–5 61.5% #122 2,123 1 22
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,029 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,921 0 13 — — — — — — —
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,873 0 13 2022 0–1 0.0% #761 2,093 1 22

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Berdych Juan Martin del Potro
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 3 4 7 42.9% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 2004 7 5 12 58.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 21 19 40 52.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
19 2005 12 14 26 46.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 2008 27 11 38 71.1% 13 3 16 81.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
20 2006 23 14 37 62.2% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 40 11 51 78.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2007 21 14 35 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2010 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 25 14 39 64.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 32 13 45 71.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 2009 21 16 37 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 40 12 52 76.9% 14 3 17 82.4% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
24 2010 25 19 44 56.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2013 43 12 55 78.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2011 36 15 51 70.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2014 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 39 14 53 73.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 36 16 52 69.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2016 21 7 28 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2014 38 15 53 71.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2017 30 12 42 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2015 40 16 56 71.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2018 37 9 46 80.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
30 2016 27 13 40 67.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2019 2 1 3 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2017 17 10 27 63.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 10 6 16 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 13 8 21 61.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 391 211 602 65.0% 131 79 210 62.4% 68 31 99 68.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — 308 119 427 72.1% 76 36 112 67.9% 40 18 58 69.0% 2 1 3 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 909/923 of Tomas Berdych's and 579/600 of Juan Martin del Potro's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Berdych Juan Martin del Potro
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 3/3 13.3 4.7 56.4% 72.9% 52.7% 68.7% 29.2% 64.3% 35.1% 2006 22/22 2.2 2.6 72.3% 64.5% 50.1% 58.2% 45.1% 60.5% 39.7%
18 2004 25/29 7.5 3.8 58.1% 72.3% 47.6% 55.4% 42.0% 62.1% 37.8% 2007 49/50 6.4 2.7 62.8% 71.8% 53.5% 58.3% 47.0% 64.6% 38.9%
19 2005 57/57 7.6 2.8 57.3% 74.0% 51.4% 56.0% 44.2% 64.3% 36.2% 2008 59/60 5.0 2.5 61.7% 74.7% 53.8% 62.3% 48.2% 66.5% 41.6%
20 2006 66/66 7.6 2.8 58.6% 76.0% 52.3% 57.2% 43.6% 65.9% 38.9% 2009 66/67 8.3 2.6 62.0% 74.4% 53.5% 63.3% 40.9% 66.4% 39.7%
21 2007 62/63 7.7 2.3 58.9% 78.4% 55.0% 65.5% 48.9% 68.9% 37.7% 2010 6/6 15.2 4.7 58.4% 69.0% 44.1% 58.8% 33.1% 59.1% 36.7%
22 2008 48/51 8.0 2.1 60.3% 76.4% 55.0% 62.4% 46.9% 67.9% 38.5% 2011 61/63 7.8 2.0 62.2% 77.3% 57.3% 63.5% 48.4% 69.6% 39.8%
23 2009 57/57 6.8 2.5 58.9% 74.3% 52.7% 60.4% 39.3% 65.5% 37.5% 2012 73/79 7.7 2.1 64.8% 75.8% 55.0% 66.4% 43.6% 68.2% 39.6%
24 2010 65/65 8.1 2.4 56.4% 79.6% 56.8% 64.4% 43.0% 69.6% 40.2% 2013 67/68 7.1 2.1 65.2% 75.7% 54.9% 65.6% 43.4% 68.3% 38.8%
25 2011 73/74 6.6 2.0 58.1% 77.7% 54.4% 53.0% 43.8% 67.8% 40.5% 2014 10/10 11.1 1.6 65.1% 77.3% 58.5% 69.5% 43.7% 71.0% 35.6%
26 2012 72/73 8.5 2.3 58.8% 78.5% 55.1% 67.5% 45.3% 68.8% 39.5% 2015 4/4 9.3 2.0 63.9% 82.0% 54.5% 50.0% 38.9% 72.2% 31.6%
27 2013 74/75 8.1 2.3 58.6% 78.0% 52.4% 64.1% 43.5% 67.5% 40.0% 2016 35/41 6.4 2.5 64.0% 77.5% 53.8% 58.7% 38.0% 69.0% 37.4%
28 2014 74/75 8.2 2.6 57.5% 78.8% 54.9% 65.2% 41.6% 68.6% 39.1% 2017 54/55 8.5 2.3 64.4% 76.5% 51.2% 60.1% 43.8% 67.5% 36.7%
29 2015 79/79 7.4 2.0 56.6% 78.0% 55.5% 60.4% 48.5% 68.3% 39.9% 2018 60/61 9.3 1.8 65.6% 77.2% 53.6% 59.0% 43.8% 69.1% 40.3%
30 2016 57/58 8.4 3.0 57.1% 78.0% 50.4% 58.8% 40.7% 66.2% 36.6% 2019 12/13 10.8 2.7 64.9% 77.0% 53.1% 55.7% 43.2% 68.3% 37.5%
31 2017 53/53 7.8 2.4 57.8% 78.9% 55.1% 66.9% 51.8% 68.8% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 22/23 8.2 1.9 60.3% 76.5% 50.0% 66.5% 38.8% 66.2% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 22/22 6.7 2.5 59.0% 75.2% 51.5% 64.8% 39.7% 65.4% 36.8% 2022 1/1 1.0 0.0 69.6% 51.3% 41.2% 58.3% 100.0% 48.2% 26.2%
Career — 909/923 7.8 2.5 58.1% 77.3% 53.6% 61.7% 44.3% 67.4% 38.6% — 579/600 7.5 2.3 64.0% 75.2% 53.9% 62.0% 44.2% 67.4% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Berdych Juan Martin del Potro
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1489 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1526 108.9 +0.33 -1.90 0.983 49.1% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.09 2006 1634 132.7 -1.67 +1.31 1.004 50.3% -26 -17 — 49.0% +0.31 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 100.8 +0.10
18 2004 1699 136.0 +0.40 +0.09 0.997 50.0% -15 -38 — 48.1% -0.08 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 +0.26 2007 1785 150.1 +1.44 +2.80 1.100 51.8% -8 -190 -144 56.0% +0.53 6–7 (46%) 5–9 (36%) 96.2 -1.92
19 2005 1871 147.6 +2.21 -0.32 1.012 50.3% -3 -159 -286 54.1% +0.29 12–11 (52%) 13–14 (48%) 101.3 -2.61 2008 1991 156.7 +3.27 +4.69 1.241 53.6% +2 -152 -289 71.4% +1.45 6–0 (100%) 11–6 (65%) 112.1 +1.21
20 2006 1934 149.9 +3.95 +1.79 1.142 52.2% -25 -144 -133 59.6% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 13–12 (52%) 104.1 -0.19 2009 2199 173.8 +3.99 +4.56 1.179 52.7% +3 -179 — 68.8% +1.14 17–5 (77%) 18–9 (67%) 110.6 -1.53
21 2007 1909 153.2 +5.09 +1.51 1.210 53.2% -28 -81 +50 65.3% +1.03 6–5 (55%) 20–12 (63%) 105.6 +1.36 2010 2119 124.9 -1.86 -0.24 0.896 48.0% +1 — — 50.0% -0.23 1–1 0–2 — +0.07
22 2008 1924 157.2 +4.14 +2.63 1.197 53.0% +18 -89 +16 61.1% +0.86 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 96.8 -0.54 2011 2045 166.0 +6.05 +3.34 1.311 54.3% -5 +81 -168 69.7% +1.32 6–1 (86%) 12–12 (50%) 101.9 -1.26
23 2009 1889 149.6 +1.93 +1.34 1.088 51.1% +8 -68 +89 56.1% +0.35 13–11 (54%) 14–8 (64%) 101.9 +1.55 2012 2229 175.3 +5.34 +3.94 1.245 53.5% -5 -35 -186 71.7% +1.24 10–4 (71%) 27–16 (63%) 107.9 -2.48
24 2010 1922 165.7 +5.92 +4.41 1.325 54.2% -60 +13 +227 62.2% +1.05 10–12 (45%) 10–15 (40%) 92.8 +0.74 2013 2208 176.9 +5.15 +3.49 1.227 53.2% +57 -66 -69 70.1% +1.06 17–11 (61%) 21–12 (64%) 104.1 +1.25
25 2011 2083 169.8 +5.45 +3.99 1.258 54.0% +29 -160 +53 69.2% +1.41 11–7 (61%) 13–7 (65%) 104.7 +2.97 2014 2138 142.5 +3.50 0.00 1.229 53.4% +41 — — 68.0% +0.92 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 +0.16
26 2012 2154 175.6 +5.87 +4.18 1.263 54.1% +29 -74 -142 66.3% +1.18 12–7 (63%) 17–14 (55%) 103.2 -0.55 2015 2092 120.9 +1.85 -1.89 1.138 51.8% +46 — — 44.4% +0.56 1–0 1–3 (25%) — -0.04
27 2013 2082 173.8 +4.74 +4.38 1.231 53.4% +45 -31 -22 67.2% +1.15 9–11 (45%) 17–17 (50%) 92.8 +0.42 2016 2152 166.2 +4.85 +2.07 1.205 53.1% +35 -45 -62 66.3% +0.94 5–1 (83%) 13–7 (65%) 105.6 -3.63
28 2014 2084 170.2 +4.10 +3.96 1.243 53.3% +44 -21 -19 68.2% +1.12 9–9 (50%) 9–16 (36%) 88.5 +3.87 2017 2175 172.9 +4.16 +2.23 1.129 51.7% +30 -70 — 64.0% +0.62 11–5 (69%) 18–7 (72%) 106.7 -3.90
29 2015 2112 176.1 +5.06 +4.69 1.258 53.9% +44 +48 -47 67.7% +1.11 9–5 (64%) 24–10 (71%) 106.0 +2.13 2018 2190 171.3 +5.25 +4.79 1.302 54.1% +18 -57 -120 74.8% +1.40 7–4 (64%) 21–10 (68%) 103.3 -0.93
30 2016 2081 169.7 +3.41 +1.04 1.085 51.4% +7 +79 +38 60.9% +0.72 11–3 (79%) 15–14 (52%) 101.8 -0.93 2019 2124 141.2 +2.38 +1.53 1.181 52.7% +53 -26 — 65.7% +1.17 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.25
31 2017 2029 162.0 +4.46 +0.86 1.159 52.5% -34 +39 +113 61.1% +0.67 7–8 (47%) 16–13 (55%) 94.9 -1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1922 155.3 +2.29 +0.98 1.096 51.6% +93 +39 +185 53.4% +0.60 1–6 (14%) 3–8 (27%) 88.6 -1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1873 152.7 +1.30 +0.72 1.063 51.0% +63 — — 55.0% +0.40 5–3 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 99.1 -0.94 2022 2094 102.5 -3.25 -4.28 0.506 38.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01
Career — 2233 169.6 +4.17 +2.64 1.181 52.7% +14 -50 +11 62.3% +0.85 135–115 (54%) 200–177 (53%) 97.9 +0.51 — 2272 173.0 +4.08 +3.38 1.200 53.0% +14 -67 -144 67.4% +1.05 94–46 (67%) 149–100 (60%) 110.5 -2.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.