H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Juan Martin del Potro H2H: 4-4

Tomas Berdych and Juan Martin del Potro are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Juan Martin del Potro leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2018 Australian Open third round 6-3 6-3 6-2.

CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
ARG Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 21, 2018* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #20 6-3 6-3 6-2 Juan Martin del Potro #10 Match data
Aug 15, 2017* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Juan Martin del Potro #30 3-6 7-6(1) 6-0 Tomas Berdych #15 Match data
Mar 13, 2016* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 7-6(4) 6-2 Juan Martin del Potro #420 Match data
Jun 5, 2012* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Juan Martin del Potro #9 7-6(6) 1-6 6-3 7-5 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
May 12, 2012* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Tomas Berdych #7 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Juan Martin del Potro #11 Match data
Feb 18, 2012* Rotterdam ATP 500 SF Hard Juan Martin del Potro #10 6-3 6-1 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
May 13, 2009* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Juan Martin del Potro #5 6-2 4-1 (ret.) Tomas Berdych #22 Match data
Oct 5, 2008* Tokyo ATP 500 F Hard Tomas Berdych #27 6-1 6-4 Juan Martin del Potro #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Juan Martin del Potro #761 #3 6,825 2,273 416 172 70.7% 1 1 0 9 11 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Juan Martin del Potro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 2006 10–12 45.5% #92 1,634 0 0
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 2007 26–24 52.0% #44 1,785 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2008 44–16 73.3% #9 1,975 0 4
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2009 51–16 76.1% #5 2,198 1 7
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2010 3–3 50.0% #258 2,117 1 7
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2011 46–17 73.0% #11 2,042 1 9
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2012 57–16 78.1% #7 2,212 1 13
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2013 52–16 76.5% #5 2,210 1 17
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2014 7–3 70.0% #137 2,139 1 18
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2015 2–2 50.0% #590 2,093 1 18
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2016 24–11 68.6% #38 2,115 1 19
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2017 38–17 69.1% #11 2,160 1 20
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2018 48–13 78.7% #5 2,190 1 22
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2019 8–5 61.5% #122 2,096 1 22
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2022 0–1 0.0% #761 2,066 1 22