H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Juan Monaco H2H: 5-0

Tomas Berdych holds a 5–0 lead over Juan Monaco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2015 Miami Masters quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 3, 2015* Miami Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Tomas Berdych #9 6-3 6-4 Juan Monaco #46 Match data
Aug 17, 2011* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #9 7-6(2) 6-0 Juan Monaco #39 Match data
May 11, 2011* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tomas Berdych #7 6-2 6-2 Juan Monaco #37 Match data
May 6, 2011* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Tomas Berdych #7 7-5 6-3 Juan Monaco #43 Match data
Jan 20, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #13 3-6 6-3 7-6(5) 6-2 Juan Monaco #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,046 319 256 55.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Juan Monaco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,641 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2008 27–20 57.4% #46 1,768 0 3
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,850 0 3
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,838 0 3
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,932 0 3
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2012 36–17 67.9% #12 1,944 0 7
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2013 18–21 46.2% #42 1,809 0 7
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2014 20–18 52.6% #62 1,856 0 7
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,811 0 7
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2016 16–13 55.2% #65 1,864 0 8
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,805 0 8