H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 3-0
Tomas Berdych holds a 3–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2012 Rome Masters third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2012* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 6-4 6-1 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2011* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-4 6-1 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2006* | Mumbai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-2 6-2 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tomas Berdych | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |