H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Malek Jaziri H2H: 1-0

Tomas Berdych holds a 1–0 lead over Malek Jaziri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2016 Roland Garros second round 6-1 2-6 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Malek Jaziri
TUN Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Berdych #8 6-1 2-6 6-2 6-4 Malek Jaziri #72 Match data May 26, 2016* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,233 599 324 64.9% 0 1 0 3 9 13
Malek Jaziri #1,645 #42 1,042 1,843 84 136 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Malek Jaziri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 15–14 51.7% #45 1,699 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,871 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,909 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2008 32–19 62.7% #20 1,924 0 4 — — — — — — —
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,888 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,922 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,082 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 2012 52–21 71.2% #6 2,153 0 8 — — — — — — —
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,081 0 8 2011 1–1 50.0% #118 1,536 0 0
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,083 0 10 2012 6–11 35.3% #116 1,603 0 0
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,111 0 12 2013 0–1 0.0% #168 1,606 0 0
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2014 8–11 42.1% #76 1,687 0 0
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,029 0 13 2015 12–20 37.5% #103 1,681 0 0
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,921 0 13 2016 15–22 40.5% #58 1,724 0 0
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,873 0 13 2017 13–22 37.1% #98 1,697 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2018 20–22 47.6% #45 1,716 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2019 6–17 26.1% #201 1,555 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2020 0–2 0.0% #249 1,530 0 0
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–3 40.0% #312 1,522 0 0
38 — — — — — — — 2022 1–3 25.0% #433 1,508 0 0
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #1645 1,504 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Berdych Malek Jaziri
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 7 5 12 58.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 12 14 26 46.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 23 14 37 62.2% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 21 14 35 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 25 14 39 64.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 21 16 37 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 25 19 44 56.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 36 15 51 70.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 39 14 53 73.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 36 16 52 69.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 38 15 53 71.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
29 2015 40 16 56 71.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 27 13 40 67.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2014 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2017 17 10 27 63.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2015 9 14 23 39.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2018 10 6 16 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 9 15 24 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
33 2019 13 8 21 61.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 13 15 28 46.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 10 14 24 41.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 2 6 8 25.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 391 211 602 65.0% 131 79 210 62.4% 68 31 99 68.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — 56 87 143 39.2% 20 30 50 40.0% 8 19 27 29.6% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 909/923 of Tomas Berdych's and 217/220 of Malek Jaziri's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Berdych Malek Jaziri
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 3/3 13.3 4.7 56.4% 72.9% 52.7% 68.7% 29.2% 64.3% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 25/29 7.5 3.8 58.1% 72.3% 47.6% 55.4% 42.0% 62.1% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 57/57 7.6 2.8 57.3% 74.0% 51.4% 56.0% 44.2% 64.3% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 66/66 7.6 2.8 58.6% 76.0% 52.3% 57.2% 43.6% 65.9% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 62/63 7.7 2.3 58.9% 78.4% 55.0% 65.5% 48.9% 68.9% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 48/51 8.0 2.1 60.3% 76.4% 55.0% 62.4% 46.9% 67.9% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 57/57 6.8 2.5 58.9% 74.3% 52.7% 60.4% 39.3% 65.5% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 65/65 8.1 2.4 56.4% 79.6% 56.8% 64.4% 43.0% 69.6% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 73/74 6.6 2.0 58.1% 77.7% 54.4% 53.0% 43.8% 67.8% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 72/73 8.5 2.3 58.8% 78.5% 55.1% 67.5% 45.3% 68.8% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 74/75 8.1 2.3 58.6% 78.0% 52.4% 64.1% 43.5% 67.5% 40.0% 2011 2/2 6.5 5.5 54.8% 71.2% 50.1% 70.1% 17.6% 61.8% 36.2%
28 2014 74/75 8.2 2.6 57.5% 78.8% 54.9% 65.2% 41.6% 68.6% 39.1% 2012 15/17 4.8 2.7 58.9% 65.8% 47.9% 55.5% 31.5% 58.5% 34.1%
29 2015 79/79 7.4 2.0 56.6% 78.0% 55.5% 60.4% 48.5% 68.3% 39.9% 2013 1/1 2.0 2.0 48.1% 61.5% 47.6% 54.5% 50.0% 54.3% 24.2%
30 2016 57/58 8.4 3.0 57.1% 78.0% 50.4% 58.8% 40.7% 66.2% 36.6% 2014 19/19 3.9 3.1 49.1% 72.1% 48.7% 58.2% 32.9% 60.3% 32.5%
31 2017 53/53 7.8 2.4 57.8% 78.9% 55.1% 66.9% 51.8% 68.8% 36.1% 2015 32/32 4.4 3.0 52.9% 71.2% 49.6% 61.7% 38.5% 61.1% 34.1%
32 2018 22/23 8.2 1.9 60.3% 76.5% 50.0% 66.5% 38.8% 66.2% 37.0% 2016 36/37 4.1 3.3 53.0% 72.1% 49.4% 59.0% 33.9% 61.5% 34.2%
33 2019 22/22 6.7 2.5 59.0% 75.2% 51.5% 64.8% 39.7% 65.4% 36.8% 2017 35/35 4.9 3.5 52.8% 71.1% 47.7% 52.2% 39.8% 60.0% 34.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 42/42 3.7 3.0 54.2% 70.8% 48.4% 55.2% 43.8% 60.3% 35.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 23/23 2.9 3.5 56.1% 67.7% 46.6% 59.9% 43.4% 58.5% 33.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 2/2 2.5 2.5 49.0% 41.0% 47.8% 47.2% 0.0% 44.4% 28.3%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 5/5 1.8 1.6 54.3% 60.1% 48.2% 42.0% 77.8% 54.6% 33.9%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 3.8 1.5 54.1% 66.8% 47.3% 51.8% 41.7% 57.9% 27.8%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 2.0 2.0 43.2% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 37.8% 23.1%
Career — 909/923 7.8 2.5 58.1% 77.3% 53.6% 61.7% 44.3% 67.4% 38.6% — 217/220 4.0 3.1 53.5% 69.8% 48.3% 56.5% 38.8% 59.8% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Berdych Malek Jaziri
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1526 108.9 +0.33 -1.90 0.983 49.1% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1699 136.0 +0.40 +0.09 0.997 50.0% -15 -38 — 48.1% -0.08 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1871 147.6 +2.21 -0.32 1.012 50.3% -3 -159 -286 54.1% +0.29 12–11 (52%) 13–14 (48%) — -2.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1934 149.9 +3.95 +1.79 1.142 52.2% -25 -144 -133 59.6% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1909 153.2 +5.09 +1.51 1.210 53.2% -28 -81 +50 65.3% +1.03 6–5 (55%) 20–12 (63%) — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1924 157.2 +4.14 +2.63 1.197 53.0% +18 -89 +16 61.1% +0.86 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1889 149.6 +1.93 +1.34 1.088 51.1% +8 -68 +89 56.1% +0.35 13–11 (54%) 14–8 (64%) — +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1922 165.7 +5.92 +4.41 1.325 54.2% -60 +13 +227 62.2% +1.05 10–12 (45%) 10–15 (40%) — +0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 2083 169.8 +5.45 +3.99 1.258 54.0% +29 -160 +53 69.2% +1.41 11–7 (61%) 13–7 (65%) — +2.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 2154 175.6 +5.87 +4.18 1.263 54.1% +29 -74 -142 66.3% +1.18 12–7 (63%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.55 2010 1457 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 2082 173.8 +4.74 +4.38 1.231 53.4% +45 -31 -22 67.2% +1.15 9–11 (45%) 17–17 (50%) — +0.42 2011 1536 118.9 -1.79 +0.89 0.949 48.5% — — — 42.9% -0.14 — — — -0.05
28 2014 2084 170.2 +4.10 +3.96 1.243 53.3% +44 -21 -19 68.2% +1.12 9–9 (50%) 9–16 (36%) — +3.87 2012 1604 124.4 -3.73 -1.37 0.823 46.4% +6 -112 +19 43.2% -0.66 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.22
29 2015 2112 176.1 +5.06 +4.69 1.258 53.9% +44 +48 -47 67.7% +1.11 9–5 (64%) 24–10 (71%) — +2.13 2013 1606 114.7 +2.69 +4.26 0.531 40.8% — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.19
30 2016 2081 169.7 +3.41 +1.04 1.085 51.4% +7 +79 +38 60.9% +0.72 11–3 (79%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.93 2014 1688 125.6 -2.36 -2.49 0.818 47.0% +14 — -54 41.9% -0.79 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — +1.41
31 2017 2029 162.0 +4.46 +0.86 1.159 52.5% -34 +39 +113 61.1% +0.67 7–8 (47%) 16–13 (55%) — -1.68 2015 1681 131.4 -3.13 -1.13 0.876 47.9% +17 -201 -48 39.8% -0.58 6–6 (50%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.89
32 2018 1922 155.3 +2.29 +0.98 1.096 51.6% +93 +39 +185 53.4% +0.60 1–6 (14%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.07 2016 1725 143.8 -1.50 -1.46 0.889 48.2% -13 -156 -117 43.9% -0.45 6–9 (40%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.41
33 2019 1873 152.7 +1.30 +0.72 1.063 51.0% +63 — — 55.0% +0.40 5–3 (63%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.94 2017 1697 145.4 -3.57 -0.39 0.864 47.4% +47 -170 — 40.0% -0.74 5–7 (42%) 6–8 (43%) — -1.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1716 138.3 -2.92 -0.31 0.893 48.3% -6 -3 -175 45.4% -0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.48
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1555 125.4 -4.00 -2.81 0.797 46.4% +71 +87 — 32.1% -1.09 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.92
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1530 110.8 0.00 -0.76 0.509 36.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.23
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1522 106.5 -3.25 -2.60 0.747 44.6% +80 — — 25.0% -2.13 — — — -0.02
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1509 105.1 -2.52 -2.80 0.659 44.2% — — — 14.3% -2.72 0–1 1–0 — -0.05
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1504 99.5 +0.80 -2.44 0.371 30.3% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.01
Career — 2233 169.6 +4.17 +2.64 1.181 52.7% +14 -50 +11 62.3% +0.85 135–115 (54%) 200–177 (53%) 97.9 +0.51 — 1843 139.1 -2.86 -1.24 0.845 47.2% +18 -42 -70 40.4% -0.74 35–38 (48%) 37–49 (43%) 101.4 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.