H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Marat Safin H2H: 1-1
Tomas Berdych and Marat Safin are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marat Safin leads 1–0 on clay, while Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2009 Shanghai Masters third round 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2009* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Marat Safin | Match data |
| May 14, 2008* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Marat Safin | 7-5 6-4 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Marat Safin | #61 | #1 | 4,300 | 2,100 | 395 | 247 | 61.5% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Berdych | Marat Safin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 69–23 | 75.0% | #2 | 2,060 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 1 | 10 |
| 22 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #3 | 1,892 | 1 | 11 |
| 23 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #77 | 1,727 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #4 | 1,987 | 1 | 14 |
| 25 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,948 | 2 | 15 |
| 26 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #26 | 1,879 | 2 | 15 |
| 27 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #56 | 1,756 | 2 | 15 |
| 28 | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #29 | 1,780 | 2 | 15 |
| 29 | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | 2009 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,777 | 2 | 15 |
| 30 | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |