H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 4-3

Tomas Berdych holds a 4–3 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2016 Halle third round 7-6(3) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 16, 2016* Halle ATP 500 R32 Grass Marcos Baghdatis #42 7-6(3) 7-6(4) Tomas Berdych #8 Match data
Oct 24, 2015* Stockholm ATP 250 SF Hard Tomas Berdych #5 6-1 (ret.) Marcos Baghdatis #46 Match data
Feb 17, 2012* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 3-0 (ret.) Marcos Baghdatis #44 Match data
Aug 20, 2010* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #20 7-5 6-4 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Jan 8, 2010* Brisbane ATP 250 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #20 6-0 6-1 Marcos Baghdatis #42 Match data
Jun 17, 2007* Halle ATP 500 F Grass Tomas Berdych #13 7-5 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #18 Match data
Mar 11, 2006* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #27 6-4 6-1 Tomas Berdych #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4