H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 7-6
Tomas Berdych holds a 7–6 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 5–4 on hard courts, while Tomas Berdych leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2012 Stockholm quarterfinal 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
7
–
6
13 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2012* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 7-6(2) | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 6-1 6-2 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2009* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-2 7-6(6) | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| May 10, 2009* | Munich | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Mar 28, 2009* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2009* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 6-7(2) 6-1 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2007* | Halle | ATP 500 | QF | Grass | Tomas Berdych | (w/o) | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| May 5, 2007* | Munich | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 6-3 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2007* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2007* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2006* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2005* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(3) | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Sep 5, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 2-6 6-1 6-3 4-6 6-1 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Berdych | Mikhail Youzhny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 |