H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 7-4
Tomas Berdych holds a 7–4 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 4–2 on hard courts and 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2013 Shanghai Masters fourth round 6-7(6) 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
7
–
4
11 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2013* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Almagro | 6-7(6) 6-3 7-6(4) | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2012* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 7-6(4) 6-4 6-1 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| May 18, 2012* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2012* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Almagro | 6-4 6-0 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3) 7-6(2) | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2011* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-2 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| May 20, 2011* | Nice | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-4 6-4 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2007* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 5-0 (ret.) | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2006* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-2 7-6(7) | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| Jul 8, 2005* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Berdych | Nicolas Almagro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |